Re: Covariance Matrix

[John Darrington]

I'm happy to do it, but I'm not sure when I'll be able to find an
uninterrupted period of time which it requires.

So I suggest that if you have other development tasks to do, then do 
those, otherwise feel free to rewrite covariance matrix yourself.

I'm not adverse to using hash tables in covariance matrix if they are 
needed, but I don't think they are necessary for the simple case (without
interactions/categorical variables).

J'


On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 08:10:58PM -0400, Jason Stover wrote:
     Given that I like solution b, how should we proceed?  Do you want to
     erase most or all of covariance-matrix.c?  Should I do it, or avoid
     it?
     
     Either way is OK with me. I think one of the first thing to do is
     get rid of any hashing business. No more interactions, too.
     
     I ask because I was the one who wrote all the crap in
     covariance-matrix.c in the first place, so on one hand, I kind of feel
     responsible, but on the other, writing crap doesn't exactly enhance
     one's confidence or motivation.
     
     
     _______________________________________________
     pspp-dev mailing list
     address@hidden
     http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev

-- 
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature