[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Next step in covariance matrix
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: Next step in covariance matrix |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:56:18 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 03:20:20PM -0400, Jason Stover wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:25:32PM +0000, John Darrington wrote:
> Will that be enough to allow a subset of GLM to be implemented?
Yes, except for the interactions.
But some tasks can be done without interactions, can't they?
J'
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Next step in covariance matrix, John Darrington, 2009/10/31