Re: Move to Gtk+2.16 ?

[Jason Stover]

Sounds OK to me.

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 06:04:34AM +0000, John Darrington wrote:
> Looking at recent bug reports (at address@hidden and on 3rd
> party forums such as Debian) it seems that this issue is becoming 
> urgent.  Unless anyone has any objections, I'm going to start a 
> Gtk+-2.18 branch so as to avoid falling too far behind on this 
> problem.
> 
> J'
> 
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:33:17PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>      Ben Pfaff <address@hidden> writes:
>      > I'll figure out how hard it would be to build GTK+ 2.18 for
>      > backports.org.  If it's not too hard, then we could just advise
>      > users to update their GTK+ version.
>      
>      It seems that it may not be that hard.  I'm going to give it a
>      shot, anyhow, at least asking Debian's Glib and GTK+ library
>      maintainers whether they know of a reason that it's a bad idea.
>      -- 
>      Ben Pfaff 
>      http://benpfaff.org
>      
>      
>      _______________________________________________
>      pspp-dev mailing list
>      address@hidden
>      http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
> 
> -- 
> PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
> fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
> See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.
> 
> 



> _______________________________________________
> pspp-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev