[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: covariance test success
From: |
Jason Stover |
Subject: |
Re: covariance test success |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:01:34 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:12:00AM +0000, John Darrington wrote:
> So, to answer the question what to do next, I propose:
>
> 1. Change REGRESSION etc. to use new covariance routines. and test thoroughly.
>
> 2. Fix up the missing value problem and write some rigorous test routines.
>
> 3. Drop the existing src/category.c and covariance-matrix.c
>
> 4. Merge ?
>
> 5. Extend src/math/categoricals.c to work with interactions between arbitrary
> permutations of variables. Possibly the file should be renamed to
> src/math/interactions.c or similar ?
>
> 6. Write a super-dooper GLM routine using the new modules.
This sounds good to me. I'll start changing files on the covariance
branch to make use of covariance.c.