[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Debugging case refs
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: Debugging case refs |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:07:22 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
OK. How about this new patch, which keeps the switch entirely within
case.c
J'
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:42:03PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
> It's almost impossible to track down memory leaks when ref counted
> objects are involved. I'm proposing this patch to case.[ch] which
> allows a preprocessor option to be set redefining case_ref and
case_unref
> to unconditionally copy and destroy cases respectively.
>
> It would be easier to use if we could put the switch entirely inside
case.c,
> since almost everything depends upon case.h -- but we could only do that
> if we sacrificed the benefits of the inline functions.
I think that this is valuable enough that we should move it into
case.c. I'm half-inclined to think that we should make it
configurable at runtime instead of at compilation time, but once
it is isolated in case.c this is less important because only a
single file will have to be recompiled if the setting changes.
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.
caseref2.patch
Description: Text Data
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Debugging case refs, John Darrington, 2010/10/03
- Re: Debugging case refs, Ben Pfaff, 2010/10/04
- Re: Debugging case refs,
John Darrington <=
- Re: Debugging case refs, Ben Pfaff, 2010/10/25
- Re: Debugging case refs, Ben Pfaff, 2010/10/26
- Re: Debugging case refs, John Darrington, 2010/10/26
- Re: Debugging case refs, Ben Pfaff, 2010/10/26
- Re: Debugging case refs, John Darrington, 2010/10/26
- Re: Debugging case refs, Ben Pfaff, 2010/10/27