[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch for review
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: patch for review |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Oct 2013 09:04:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 09:56:05PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:39:06PM +0200, John Darrington wrote:
> I'd appreciate a review of this patch before I push it. Thanks.
The old code and the new code make sense to me, I think. It's not
obvious to me how it will simplify upcoming code (or what that code will
do), but it seems fine.
It might use a few comments, especially in the new header file, to
explain the overall purpose of the object. The commit message explains
it a little bit, but it would be useful to have that in the code too.
You're right. I'll add some comments and check it in. Thanks for the review.
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature