Re: SPSS vs PSPP syntax

[Carlos González Haro]

Hi guys,

I would like to get the 0.8.5 version for mac (.dmg). Would you be so kind to provide me a link to get that version. I will appreciate your help.

King regards.

Carlos

Carlos González Haro, PhD, MSc, BSc
Physical Fitness Coach / Sport Physiologist / Senior Sport Scientist

LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/carlosgonzalezharo

2015-07-31 8:47 GMT+02:00 Friedrich Beckmann <address@hidden>:

Dear Douglas,

thanks for the reply and the new bug descriptions regarding t-test groups and the regression command. 

I opened a bug in the bug database regarding the regression syntax:

http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?45667

The spss v23 syntax description 

ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/documentation/statistics/23.0/en/client/Manuals/IBM_SPSS_Statistics_Command_Syntax_Reference.pdf

says that the groups command should separate the values with comma, but I guess you produced the syntax via the spss GUI, right? 

Regards

Friedrich

Am 31.07.2015 um 07:04 schrieb Douglas Bonett <address@hidden>:

I am using version 22 of SPSS and it does not complain if I use CIN.   

I also noticed that SPSS V22 uses slightly different syntax for an independent samples t-test. SPSS produces:

T-TEST GROUPS=group(1 2)

  /MISSING=ANALYSIS

  /VARIABLES=score

  /CRITERIA=CI(.95).

which PSPP does not like.  PSPP wants group(1,2) but SPSS does not complain with group(1,2).

There seems to be more serious discrepancies between SPSS and PSPP syntax for linear regression. For a simple linear model SPSS produces

REGRESSION

  /MISSING LISTWISE

  /STATISTICS COEFF OUTS CI(95) R ANOVA

  /CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.10)

  /NOORIGIN

  /DEPENDENT y

  /METHOD=ENTER x.

while PSSS gives

REGRESSION
    /VARIABLES= x
    /DEPENDENT=     y
    /STATISTICS=COEFF CI R ANOVA.

SPSS V22 does not accept the PSPP regression syntax. 

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Friedrich Beckmann <address@hidden> wrote:

Dear Douglas,

thank you for the bug report. I filed a bug in the bug database of pspp:

https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?45664

As mentioned in the bug report the spss manual uses CIN in the examples. Does your spss version complain if you use CIN instead of CI?

Friedrich

Am 30.07.2015 um 22:14 schrieb Douglas Bonett <address@hidden>:

 PSPP uses CIN(.95) rather than CI(.95).  I hope this is a bug and not intentional. 

--

Friedrich Beckmann, Bismarckstraße 11, 86159 Augsburg

Tel: 0821-44923693, Mobil: 017648576782

_______________________________________________
pspp-dev mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev