[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Running tests under wine.
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: Running tests under wine. |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Mar 2016 08:23:28 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 06:56:17AM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:55:19PM +0100, Harry Thijssen wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:59:02 +0100
> > From: John Darrington <address@hidden>
> > To: address@hidden
> > Subject: Running tests under wine.
> >
> > I pushed a change which allows many of the tests to run under wine.
> >
> > make RUNNER=wine check
> >
> > --
> >
>
> I tried it and see the results below. Due to a patch of mine, there
> should
> 1 tests and 1 failure added to the counts.
> Would the same trick work for some of the other executables used in the
> tests?
>
> Unfortunatey I don't think so. For two reasons:
>
> 1. We cannot "shadow" the pspp-convert command using a bash function,
> because
> bash functions cannot contain hyphens.
pspp-convert is much less of a problem, because I only see a few calls
to it. It's easy enough to add $RUNNER directly to those.
> 2. As discussed earlier, many of the other commands need to be compiled for
> the
> build machine rather than the host machine. This will require significant
> rearrangement of the automake files.
Yes, this is more of a problem.
Re: Running tests under wine., Harry Thijssen, 2016/03/24