Re: Upload right for pspp and libspread-sheet-widget packages in debian

[Ben Pfaff]

All right, thanks for all the help. I think I got it right this time
by using the source package name, "spread-sheet-widget".

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:54 AM Mattia Rizzolo <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Nearly there!!
>
> 3879857 20200526173524|command|dak|program start
> 3879858 
> 20200526173526|command|dak|processing|blp-1590513019.dak-commands|signed-by=C2D1AB061656AAC54B5E975485199DE8C6648E90
> 3879859 
> 20200526173526|command|dak|dm|fingerprint|1A9F9365EF7F1142627526B1CC79D80A5BB7FC51
> 3879860 20200526173526|command|dak|dm|uid|address@hidden
> 3879861 20200526173526|command|dak|ERROR|Tried to grant permissions for 
> unknown source package: libspread-sheet-widget
>
>
> ↑↑↑↑↑↑↑ this one failed
>
> 3879862 20200526173526|command|dak|Exception while processing 
> blp-1590513019.dak-commands:|ParseMaintError('No @ found in email address 
> part.',)
> 3879863 20200526173526|command|dak|traceback|Traceback (most recent call 
> last):
> 3879864 20200526173526|command|dak|traceback|  File 
> "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_commands.py", line 78, in main
> 3879865 20200526173526|command|dak|traceback|    command.evaluate()
> 3879866 20200526173526|command|dak|traceback|  File 
> "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/daklib/command.py", line 179, in evaluate
> 3879867 20200526173526|command|dak|traceback|    self._notify_uploader()
> 3879868 20200526173526|command|dak|traceback|  File 
> "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/daklib/command.py", line 110, in 
> _notify_uploader
> 3879869 20200526173526|command|dak|traceback|    '__MAINTAINER_TO__': 
> fix_maintainer(self.uploader)[1],
> 3879870 20200526173526|command|dak|traceback|  File 
> "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/daklib/textutils.py", line 114, in 
> fix_maintainer
> 3879871 20200526173526|command|dak|traceback|    raise ParseMaintError("No @ 
> found in email address part.")
> 3879872 20200526173526|command|dak|traceback|ParseMaintError: No @ found in 
> email address part.
> 3879873 
> 20200526173526|command|dak|processing|blp-1590513027.dak-commands|signed-by=C2D1AB061656AAC54B5E975485199DE8C6648E90
> 3879874 
> 20200526173526|command|dak|dm|fingerprint|1A9F9365EF7F1142627526B1CC79D80A5BB7FC51
> 3879875 20200526173526|command|dak|dm|uid|address@hidden
> 3879876 
> 20200526173526|command|dak|dm|allow|1A9F9365EF7F1142627526B1CC79D80A5BB7FC51|pspp
>
>
> ↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑ this one is a success!
>
> 3879877 20200526173526|command|dak|Exception while processing 
> blp-1590513027.dak-commands:|ParseMaintError('No @ found in email address 
> part.',)
> 3879878 20200526173526|command|dak|traceback|Traceback (most recent call 
> last):
> 3879879 20200526173526|command|dak|traceback|  File 
> "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_commands.py", line 78, in main
> 3879880 20200526173526|command|dak|traceback|    command.evaluate()
> 3879881 20200526173526|command|dak|traceback|  File 
> "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/daklib/command.py", line 179, in evaluate
> 3879882 20200526173526|command|dak|traceback|    self._notify_uploader()
> 3879883 20200526173526|command|dak|traceback|  File 
> "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/daklib/command.py", line 110, in 
> _notify_uploader
> 3879884 20200526173526|command|dak|traceback|    '__MAINTAINER_TO__': 
> fix_maintainer(self.uploader)[1],
> 3879885 20200526173526|command|dak|traceback|  File 
> "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/daklib/textutils.py", line 114, in 
> fix_maintainer
> 3879886 20200526173526|command|dak|traceback|    raise ParseMaintError("No @ 
> found in email address part.")
> 3879887 20200526173526|command|dak|traceback|ParseMaintError: No @ found in 
> email address part.
> 3879888 20200526173526|command|dak|program end
>
>
> I don't know what's wrong in particular that cause the mail routine to
> fail: I'm sure I granted DM rights for people not that many months ago,
> and it used to just work.
> Regardless, I'm not interested enough to dig it up myself.
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:14:35AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > I'm using dput-ng. This is a bad user interface.
>
> I thought dput-ng was clever than that.  It also does sanity check
> against the locally available dm keyring (but you need to override those
> check since Friedrich's key is not yet there - and won't be a little
> while more).  The manpage does say that it passes the fingerprint
> straight to the dak-commands file (which means people needs to be
> completely aware of the file format), but at least it could bother doing
> a couple of checks and issue a warning.
>
> once the debian-policy source package is updated, you'll be able to
> write
>
>     dcut dm --uid address@hidden --allow foobar
>
> with a way lower possiblity of failure.
>
> --
> regards,
>                         Mattia Rizzolo
>
> GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
> More about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
> Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
> Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-