[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Not Implemented Commands
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: Not Implemented Commands |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Oct 2020 08:21:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
I see where you are coming from. However, your concern would also apply (say)
to
unimplemented subcommands of existing commands. We don't list those. Also, I'm
not proposing to remove the list entirely - only from the manual. So if
somebody
(for example) tries to issue the command "EDIT" then they will still see the
message
"error: EDIT: EDIT is not yet implemented." which I think should explain what
is
going on.
J'
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 08:56:39PM +0200, Friedrich Beckmann wrote:
Except if I look for something. My assumption for the first hours is that
I am too stupid to find it…
> Am 12.10.2020 um 19:58 schrieb John Darrington
<john@darrington.wattle.id.au>:
>
> In my opionion, we should delete Chapter 20 of the user manual "Not
Implemented".
>
> I think the manual is large enough explaining what PSPP can do, and
there is
> little purpose listing things it can't.
>
> Objections?
>
> J'
>