[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Simple question about emacs
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: Simple question about emacs |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:34:51 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Michel Boaventura <address@hidden> writes:
> I'm sending both the file and one screenshot of what I see. Seems like
> a line after a comment is interpreted
> as coment also.
A comment that begins with * extends until the end of the
command. Usually, a command ends with '.' at the end of a line.
So, if you put a '.' at the end of your comment, that fixes the
coloring.
(A completely blank line can also end a command, depending on the
PSPP settings. It looks like the PSPP mode does not interpret a
blank line as ending a command.)
> And if I use non-ascii chars on comment, the comment becomes
> red, but if I use only ascii chars, it becomes yellow.
I could not reproduce this. For me, the presence of non-ASCII
characters did not seem to make any difference.
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org
- Re: Simple question about emacs, Jason Stover, 2009/04/27
- Re: Simple question about emacs, Ben Pfaff, 2009/04/27
- Re: Simple question about emacs, Michel Boaventura, 2009/04/27
- Re: Simple question about emacs,
Ben Pfaff <=
- Re: Simple question about emacs, Michel Boaventura, 2009/04/27
- Re: Simple question about emacs, Michel Boaventura, 2009/04/27
- Re: Simple question about emacs, Ben Pfaff, 2009/04/27
- Re: Simple question about emacs, Michel Boaventura, 2009/04/27
- Re: Simple question about emacs, Ben Pfaff, 2009/04/28
- Re: Simple question about emacs, Ben Pfaff, 2009/04/28
- Re: Simple question about emacs, Jason Stover, 2009/04/28
- Re: Simple question about emacs, John Darrington, 2009/04/28