psychosynth-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [psynth-devel] On the future of the Psychosynth UI, opinions needed


From: Juan Pedro Bolivar Puente
Subject: Re: [psynth-devel] On the future of the Psychosynth UI, opinions needed
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 12:49:07 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100918 Icedove/3.0.8

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/10/10 19:56, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> 
>> I am starting to consider mobile touchable devices as one of the most
>> important factors to drive future development. It seems that the two
>> most sensible choices are GTK+Clutter+MX or Qt. Meego seems to be using
>> the first but it is moving to the later with the push of Nokia. Should
>> we just stop bothering and use Qt?
>>
> 
> Check "Meego Touch", the new Qt based interface for Meego.
> http://apidocs.meego.com/mtf/tutorial.html
> 

Yep, I was looking at that just before I sent the email :) I still
wonder how would those applications look on normal computers (I would
like the program to be usable without a super fancy device). Maybe it is
better to just use Qt (it is probably ok for tablets and "big screen
multitouch stuff") and maybe later write and adapted interface for
mobile phones using Meego Touch that reuses most of the other code
(seems that the API integrates very well with code using raw
QGraphicsScene and QGesture).

Well, there are still a few months before we start working on the new UI
so maybe time will make things more clear as Meego and other Free
Software platforms based multi touch devices start going into the market.

JP
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEUEARECAAYFAkyrAqMACgkQchi8veCammcSawCfcF6ZqbIQT7mwO9EfgcR4r429
tOoAkwYTEgHkUO1ahmvMM5F9LXfjzOY=
=oRfg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]