qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/12] target/arm: VFP decodetree con


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/12] target/arm: VFP decodetree conversion followups
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:27:38 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1

On 6/13/19 6:39 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> This patchset does a couple of the cleanup/leftover things noted
> in the coverletter of the vfp decodetree conversion or discussed
> in code review:
>  * use vfp_expand_imm() for doing the VFP const-immediate
>    decode, rather than hand-coding it
>  * get rid of the final uses of cpu_F[01][sd]
> 
> cpu_V0, cpu_V1 and cpu_M0 will have to wait until somebody
> cares to tackle the Neon decode logic and the iwmmxt decode...
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM
> 
> Peter Maydell (12):
>   target/arm: Move vfp_expand_imm() to translate.[ch]
>   target/arm: Use vfp_expand_imm() for AArch32 VFP VMOV_imm
>   target/arm: Stop using cpu_F0s for NEON_2RM_VABS_F
>   target/arm: Stop using cpu_F0s for NEON_2RM_VNEG_F
>   target/arm: Stop using cpu_F0s for NEON_2RM_VRINT*
>   target/arm: Stop using cpu_F0s for NEON_2RM_VCVT[ANPM][US]
>   target/arm: Stop using cpu_F0s for NEON_2RM_VRECPE_F and
>     NEON_2RM_VRSQRTE_F
>   target/arm: Stop using cpu_F0s for Neon f32/s32 VCVT
>   target/arm: Stop using cpu_F0s in Neon VCVT fixed-point ops
>   target/arm: stop using deprecated functions in NEON_2RM_VCVT_F16_F32
>   target/arm: Stop using deprecated functions in NEON_2RM_VCVT_F32_F16
>   target/arm: Remove unused cpu_F0s, cpu_F0d, cpu_F1s, cpu_F1d
> 
>  target/arm/translate-a64.h     |   1 -
>  target/arm/translate.h         |   7 +
>  target/arm/translate-a64.c     |  32 -----
>  target/arm/translate-vfp.inc.c |  61 +++++----
>  target/arm/translate.c         | 240 ++++++++++++---------------------
>  target/arm/vfp.decode          |  10 +-
>  6 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 218 deletions(-)
> 

Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]