[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v17 05/10] acpi: add build_append_ghes_generic_sta
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v17 05/10] acpi: add build_append_ghes_generic_status() helper for Generic Error Status Block |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:41:05 +0200 |
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 20:11:11 +0800
gengdongjiu <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 2019/6/20 20:42, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 May 2019 04:18:18 -0700
> > Dongjiu Geng <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> It will help to add Generic Error Status Block to ACPI tables
> >> without using packed C structures and avoid endianness
> >> issues as API doesn't need explicit conversion.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >> hw/acpi/aml-build.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >> include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h | 6 ++++++
> >> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> >> index 102a288..ce90970 100644
> >> --- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> >> +++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> >> @@ -296,6 +296,20 @@ void build_append_ghes_notify(GArray *table, const
> >> uint8_t type,
> >> build_append_int_noprefix(table, error_threshold_window, 4);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +/* Generic Error Status Block
> >> + * ACPI 4.0: 17.3.2.6.1 Generic Error Data
> >> + */
> >> +void build_append_ghes_generic_status(GArray *table, uint32_t
> >> block_status,
> > maybe ..._generic_error_status???
> good point, the build_append_ghes_generic_error_status() is better than
> build_append_ghes_generic_status()
>
> >
> >> + uint32_t raw_data_offset, uint32_t raw_data_length,
> >> + uint32_t data_length, uint32_t error_severity)
> > see CODING_STYLE, 1.1 Multiline Indent
> >
> >> +{
> > when describing filds from spec try to add 'verbatim' copy of the name from
> > spec
> > so it would be esy to grep for it. Like:
> > /* Block Status */
> >> + build_append_int_noprefix(table, block_status, 4);
> > /* Raw Data Offset */
> >
> > note applies all other places where you compose ACPI tables
> ok
>
> >
> >> + build_append_int_noprefix(table, raw_data_offset, 4);
> >> + build_append_int_noprefix(table, raw_data_length, 4);
> >> + build_append_int_noprefix(table, data_length, 4);
> >> + build_append_int_noprefix(table, error_severity, 4);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> /* Generic Error Data Entry
> >> * ACPI 4.0: 17.3.2.6.1 Generic Error Data
> >> */
> >> diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> >> index a71db2f..1ec7e1b 100644
> >> --- a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> >> +++ b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> >> @@ -425,6 +425,12 @@ void build_append_ghes_generic_data(GArray *table,
> >> const char *section_type,
> >> uint32_t error_data_length, uint8_t
> >> *fru_id,
> >> uint8_t *fru_text, uint64_t
> >> time_stamp);
> >>
> >> +void
> >> +build_append_ghes_generic_status(GArray *table, uint32_t block_status,
> >> + uint32_t raw_data_offset,
> >> + uint32_t raw_data_length,
> >> + uint32_t data_length, uint32_t
> >> error_severity);
> > this and previous patch, it might be better to to move declaration
> > to its own header, for example to include/hw/acpi/acpi_ghes.h
> > that you are adding later in the series.
> > And maybe move helpers to hw/acpi/acpi_ghes.c
> > They are not really independent ACPI primitives that are shared
> > with other tables, aren't they?
> Some ACPI primitives are shared with other table, such as Notification
> Structure.
> we have 10 types of error sources, some error source will share the
> Notification Structure primitives.
If read spec right, "Notification Structure" is a sub-table of HEST mechanism
so it
should be fine to put all this together in hw/acpi/acpi_ghes.c.
> Now I only implement Generic Hardware Error Source version 2 (GHESv2 - Type
> 10)
>
> > .
> >> +
> >> void build_srat_memory(AcpiSratMemoryAffinity *numamem, uint64_t base,
> >> uint64_t len, int node, MemoryAffinityFlags flags);
> >>
> >
> > .
> >
>