Re: [RFC 0/4] transaction-based ptimer API

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 04/10/19 13:48, Peter Maydell wrote:
> must be between matched calls to ptimer_transaction_begin() and
> ptimer_transaction_commit().  When ptimer_transaction_commit() is
> called it will evaluate the state of the timer after all the changes
> in the transaction, and call the callback if necessary.

Could ptimer_stop/ptimer_run act as the begin and commit functions?
That is, ptimer_set_* can be called only between ptimer_stop and ptimer_run?

Thanks,

Paolo