[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PULL 11/20] target/arm: Don't mishandle count when enabling or disablin
From: |
Richard Henderson |
Subject: |
[PULL 11/20] target/arm: Don't mishandle count when enabling or disabling PMU counters |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Sep 2022 12:52:08 +0100 |
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The PMU cycle and event counter infrastructure design requires that
operations on the PMU register fields are wrapped in pmu_op_start()
and pmu_op_finish() calls (or their more specific pmmcntr and
pmevcntr equivalents). This includes any changes to registers which
affect whether the counter should be enabled or disabled, but we
forgot to do this.
The effect of this bug is that in sequences like:
* disable the cycle counter (PMCCNTR) using the PMCNTEN register
* write a value such as 0xfffff000 to the PMCCNTR
* restart the counter by writing to PMCNTEN
the value written to the cycle counter is corrupted, and it starts
counting from the wrong place. (Essentially, we fail to record that
the QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL timestamp when the counter should be considered
to have started counting is the point when PMCNTEN is written to enable
the counter.)
Add the necessary bracketing calls, so that updates to the various
registers which affect whether the PMU is counting are handled
correctly.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220822132358.3524971-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
target/arm/helper.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index e4824e01b8..a348c7407d 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -1079,6 +1079,14 @@ static CPAccessResult pmreg_access_ccntr(CPUARMState
*env,
return pmreg_access(env, ri, isread);
}
+/*
+ * Bits in MDCR_EL2 and MDCR_EL3 which pmu_counter_enabled() looks at.
+ * We use these to decide whether we need to wrap a write to MDCR_EL2
+ * or MDCR_EL3 in pmu_op_start()/pmu_op_finish() calls.
+ */
+#define MDCR_EL2_PMU_ENABLE_BITS (MDCR_HPME | MDCR_HPMD | MDCR_HPMN)
+#define MDCR_EL3_PMU_ENABLE_BITS (MDCR_SPME)
+
/* Returns true if the counter (pass 31 for PMCCNTR) should count events using
* the current EL, security state, and register configuration.
*/
@@ -1432,15 +1440,19 @@ static uint64_t pmccfiltr_read_a32(CPUARMState *env,
const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
static void pmcntenset_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
uint64_t value)
{
+ pmu_op_start(env);
value &= pmu_counter_mask(env);
env->cp15.c9_pmcnten |= value;
+ pmu_op_finish(env);
}
static void pmcntenclr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
uint64_t value)
{
+ pmu_op_start(env);
value &= pmu_counter_mask(env);
env->cp15.c9_pmcnten &= ~value;
+ pmu_op_finish(env);
}
static void pmovsr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
@@ -4681,7 +4693,39 @@ static void sctlr_write(CPUARMState *env, const
ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
static void sdcr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
uint64_t value)
{
+ /*
+ * Some MDCR_EL3 bits affect whether PMU counters are running:
+ * if we are trying to change any of those then we must
+ * bracket this update with PMU start/finish calls.
+ */
+ bool pmu_op = (env->cp15.mdcr_el3 ^ value) & MDCR_EL3_PMU_ENABLE_BITS;
+
+ if (pmu_op) {
+ pmu_op_start(env);
+ }
env->cp15.mdcr_el3 = value & SDCR_VALID_MASK;
+ if (pmu_op) {
+ pmu_op_finish(env);
+ }
+}
+
+static void mdcr_el2_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
+ uint64_t value)
+{
+ /*
+ * Some MDCR_EL2 bits affect whether PMU counters are running:
+ * if we are trying to change any of those then we must
+ * bracket this update with PMU start/finish calls.
+ */
+ bool pmu_op = (env->cp15.mdcr_el2 ^ value) & MDCR_EL2_PMU_ENABLE_BITS;
+
+ if (pmu_op) {
+ pmu_op_start(env);
+ }
+ env->cp15.mdcr_el2 = value;
+ if (pmu_op) {
+ pmu_op_finish(env);
+ }
}
static const ARMCPRegInfo v8_cp_reginfo[] = {
@@ -7724,6 +7768,7 @@ void register_cp_regs_for_features(ARMCPU *cpu)
ARMCPRegInfo mdcr_el2 = {
.name = "MDCR_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
.opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 1, .crm = 1, .opc2 = 1,
+ .writefn = mdcr_el2_write,
.access = PL2_RW, .resetvalue = pmu_num_counters(env),
.fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.mdcr_el2),
};
--
2.34.1
- [PULL 13/20] target/arm: Honour MDCR_EL2.HPMD in Secure EL2, (continued)
- [PULL 13/20] target/arm: Honour MDCR_EL2.HPMD in Secure EL2, Richard Henderson, 2022/09/14
- [PULL 12/20] target/arm: Ignore PMCR.D when PMCR.LC is set, Richard Henderson, 2022/09/14
- [PULL 16/20] target/arm: Implement FEAT_PMUv3p5 cycle counter disable bits, Richard Henderson, 2022/09/14
- [PULL 14/20] target/arm: Detect overflow when calculating next PMU interrupt, Richard Henderson, 2022/09/14
- [PULL 15/20] target/arm: Rename pmu_8_n feature test functions, Richard Henderson, 2022/09/14
- [PULL 17/20] target/arm: Support 64-bit event counters for FEAT_PMUv3p5, Richard Henderson, 2022/09/14
- [PULL 07/20] target/arm: Advertise FEAT_ETS for '-cpu max', Richard Henderson, 2022/09/14
- [PULL 20/20] target/arm: Make boards pass base address to armv7m_load_kernel(), Richard Henderson, 2022/09/14
- [PULL 09/20] target/arm: Don't corrupt high half of PMOVSR when cycle counter overflows, Richard Henderson, 2022/09/14
- [PULL 18/20] target/arm: Report FEAT_PMUv3p5 for TCG '-cpu max', Richard Henderson, 2022/09/14
- [PULL 11/20] target/arm: Don't mishandle count when enabling or disabling PMU counters,
Richard Henderson <=
- [PULL 10/20] target/arm: Correct value returned by pmu_counter_mask(), Richard Henderson, 2022/09/14
- [PULL 19/20] target/arm: Remove useless TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN check in armv7m_load_kernel(), Richard Henderson, 2022/09/14
- Re: [PULL 00/20] target-arm.next patch queue, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2022/09/17