|
From: | Marcin Juszkiewicz |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 0/3] hw/arm/virt: Use generic CPU invalidation |
Date: | Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:44:07 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 |
W dniu 13.07.2023 o 14:34, Gavin Shan pisze:
On 7/13/23 21:52, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:W dniu 13.07.2023 o 13:44, Peter Maydell pisze:I see this isn't a change in this patch, but given that what the user specifies is not "cortex-a8-arm-cpu" but "cortex-a8", whydo we include the "-arm-cpu" suffix in the error messages? It'snot valid syntax to say "-cpu cortex-a8-arm-cpu", so it's a bit misleading...
I like the change but it (IMHO) needs to cut "-{TYPE_*_CPU}" string from names:
Peter and Marcin, how about to split the CPU types to two fields, as below? In this way, the complete CPU type will be used for validationand the 'internal' names will be used for the error messages.
Note that it should probably propagate to all architectures handled in QEMU, not only Arm ones. I do not know which machines have list of supported cpu types like arm/virt or arm/sbsa-ref ones.
I can change sbsa-ref to follow that change but let it be userfriendly.
Yes, sbsa-ref needs an extra patch to use the generic invalidation. I can add one patch on the top for that in next revision if you agree, Marcin.
I am fine with it.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |