qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/5] target/arm/helper: Fix vae2_tlbmask()


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] target/arm/helper: Fix vae2_tlbmask()
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 17:35:49 +0100

On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 at 16:56, Jean-Philippe Brucker
<jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> When HCR_EL2.E2H is enabled, TLB entries are formed using the EL2&0
> translation regime, instead of the EL2 translation regime. The TLB VAE2*
> instructions invalidate the regime that corresponds to the current value
> of HCR_EL2.E2H.
>
> At the moment we only invalidate the EL2 translation regime. This causes
> problems with RMM, which issues TLBI VAE2IS instructions with
> HCR_EL2.E2H enabled. Update vae2_tlbmask() to take HCR_EL2.E2H into
> account.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> ---
>  target/arm/helper.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
> index e1b3db6f5f..07a9ac70f5 100644
> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
> @@ -4663,6 +4663,21 @@ static int vae1_tlbmask(CPUARMState *env)
>      return mask;
>  }
>
> +static int vae2_tlbmask(CPUARMState *env)
> +{
> +    uint64_t hcr = arm_hcr_el2_eff(env);
> +    uint16_t mask;
> +
> +    if (hcr & HCR_E2H) {
> +        mask = ARMMMUIdxBit_E20_2 |
> +               ARMMMUIdxBit_E20_2_PAN |
> +               ARMMMUIdxBit_E20_0;
> +    } else {
> +        mask = ARMMMUIdxBit_E2;
> +    }
> +    return mask;
> +}
> +
>  /* Return 56 if TBI is enabled, 64 otherwise. */
>  static int tlbbits_for_regime(CPUARMState *env, ARMMMUIdx mmu_idx,
>                                uint64_t addr)

> @@ -4838,11 +4853,11 @@ static void tlbi_aa64_vae2is_write(CPUARMState *env, 
> const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
>                                     uint64_t value)
>  {
>      CPUState *cs = env_cpu(env);
> +    int mask = vae2_tlbmask(env);
>      uint64_t pageaddr = sextract64(value << 12, 0, 56);
>      int bits = tlbbits_for_regime(env, ARMMMUIdx_E2, pageaddr);

Shouldn't the argument to tlbbits_for_regime() also change
if we're dealing with the EL2&0 regime rather than EL2 ?

>
> -    tlb_flush_page_bits_by_mmuidx_all_cpus_synced(cs, pageaddr,
> -                                                  ARMMMUIdxBit_E2, bits);
> +    tlb_flush_page_bits_by_mmuidx_all_cpus_synced(cs, pageaddr, mask, bits);
>  }

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]