qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 3/3] hw/arm/smmuv3: Advertise SMMUv3.1-XNX feature


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] hw/arm/smmuv3: Advertise SMMUv3.1-XNX feature
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:54:06 +0100

On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 11:34, Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 03:57:05PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > The SMMUv3.1-XNX feature is mandatory for an SMMUv3.1 if S2P is
> > supported, so we should theoretically have implemented it as part of
> > the recent S2P work.  Fortunately, for us the implementation is a
> > no-op.
> >
> > This feature is about interpretation of the stage 2 page table
> > descriptor XN bits, which control execute permissions.
> >
> > For QEMU, the permission bits passed to an IOMMU (via MemTxAttrs and
> > IOMMUAccessFlags) only indicate read and write; we do not distinguish
> > data reads from instruction reads outside the CPU proper.  In the
> > SMMU architecture's terms, our interconnect between the client device
> > and the SMMU doesn't have the ability to convey the INST attribute,
> > and we therefore use the default value of "data" for this attribute.
> >
> > We also do not support the bits in the Stream Table Entry that can
> > override the on-the-bus transaction attribute permissions (we do not
> > set SMMU_IDR1.ATTR_PERMS_OVR=1).
> >
> > These two things together mean that for our implementation, it never
> > has to deal with transactions with the INST attribute, and so it can
> > correctly ignore the XN bits entirely.  So we already implement
> > FEAT_XNX's "XN field is now 2 bits, not 1" behaviour to the extent
> > that we need to.
> >
> > Advertise the presence of the feature in SMMU_IDR3.XNX.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  hw/arm/smmuv3.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/smmuv3.c b/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
> > index 94d388fc950..d9e639f7c41 100644
> > --- a/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
> > +++ b/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
> > @@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ static void smmuv3_init_regs(SMMUv3State *s)
> >      s->idr[1] = FIELD_DP32(s->idr[1], IDR1, CMDQS,   SMMU_CMDQS);
> >
> >      s->idr[3] = FIELD_DP32(s->idr[3], IDR3, HAD, 1);
> > +    s->idr[3] = FIELD_DP32(s->idr[3], IDR3, XNX, 1);
> May be this can be guarded when S2P is present? according the UM
> "In SMMUv3.1 and later, support for this feature is mandatory when
> stage 2 is supported, that is when SMMU_IDR0.S2P == 1."
> So I am not sure what it would mean for XNX and S1P only.

Mmm, I don't suppose it would confuse any guest code, but
it's probably safest to put in the if():

   if (FIELD_EX32(s->idr[0], IDR0, S2P) {
       /* XNX is a stage-2-specific feature */
       s->idr[3] = FIELD_DP32(s->idr[3], IDR3, XNX, 1);
   }

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]