[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-block] RFC iscsi: set FUA and DPO if !bs->enable_write_cache
From: |
Peter Lieven |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-block] RFC iscsi: set FUA and DPO if !bs->enable_write_cache |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Apr 2015 21:59:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 |
Am 14.04.2015 um 21:55 schrieb Peter Lieven:
> Am 14.04.2015 um 18:15 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>> On 14/04/2015 08:49, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Ronnie came up with an idea to reduce latency if !bs->enable_write_cache
>>> for an iSCSI device.
>>>
>>> If !bs->enable_write_cache Qemu sends a flush after every single write.
>>> What could be done is
>>> the following:
>>>
>>> if (!bs->enable_write_cache)
>>> set FUA (force unit access) and DPO (disable page out) bits in every
>>> write cmd
>>> make iscsi_co_flush a NOOP in this case.
>>>
>>> Your thoughts?
>> Yes, that would work. In fact I'm not even sure you need DPO.
>>
>> speed of cache=writethrough in general doesn't matter much, except if
>> whoever runs the guest knows that the host has battery-backed cache. In
>> that case this trick would improve latency. You could get the same with
>> -drive file.cache.no-flush=on but this would just work.
> You could, but this would not set the FUA bit. The DPO was Ronnies
> idea. Ronnie? SBC-2 says about FUA and WRITE: "Write commands shall not
> return GOOD status until the logical blocks have actually been written on the
> media (i.e., the data is not write cached)."
>
> Please correct me if I am wrong, but for iSCSI
> cachemodes none, directsync, writethrough and none are identical.
> cachemode unsafe avoids the explicit flush which is no good idea as
> we all would agree.
>
> cachemode writeback is the only one that enables bs->enable_write_cache.
> I use it for our enterprise iSCSI SANs that have battery backup and I use it
> only in conjunction with Virtio which falls back to writethrough if there is
> no support for flushes from the guest.
>
> What I would implement in the iSCSI driver is the following:
>
> a) check support for DPOFUA in the MODE SENSE page. Store it in
> iscsilun->dpofua.
> b) make iscsi_co_flush a NOOP if iscsilun->dpofua && !bs->enable_write_cache
> c) In iscsi_co_writev
> If iscsilun->dpofua && !bs->enable_write_cache set the FUA bit in the
> write command.
> d) in iscsi_co_write_zeroes
> If iscsilun->dpofua && !bs->enable_write_cache manually issue a
> iscsi_co_flush as the WRITESAME10/16 commands lack the FUA bit.
e) In iscsi_co_readv: If iscsilun->dpofua && (bs->open_flags & BDRV_O_NOCACHE)
set FUA bit in Read 10/16.
This explicitly tells the iSCSI storage to bypass its read cache.
Peter
- [Qemu-block] RFC iscsi: set FUA and DPO if !bs->enable_write_cache, Peter Lieven, 2015/04/14
- Re: [Qemu-block] RFC iscsi: set FUA and DPO if !bs->enable_write_cache, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2015/04/14
- Re: [Qemu-block] RFC iscsi: set FUA and DPO if !bs->enable_write_cache, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/04/14
- Re: [Qemu-block] RFC iscsi: set FUA and DPO if !bs->enable_write_cache, Peter Lieven, 2015/04/14
- Re: [Qemu-block] RFC iscsi: set FUA and DPO if !bs->enable_write_cache, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/04/15
- Re: [Qemu-block] RFC iscsi: set FUA and DPO if !bs->enable_write_cache, Peter Lieven, 2015/04/16
- Re: [Qemu-block] RFC iscsi: set FUA and DPO if !bs->enable_write_cache, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/04/16
- Re: [Qemu-block] RFC iscsi: set FUA and DPO if !bs->enable_write_cache, Peter Lieven, 2015/04/16
- Re: [Qemu-block] RFC iscsi: set FUA and DPO if !bs->enable_write_cache, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/04/16
- Re: [Qemu-block] RFC iscsi: set FUA and DPO if !bs->enable_write_cache, Peter Lieven, 2015/04/16
- Re: [Qemu-block] RFC iscsi: set FUA and DPO if !bs->enable_write_cache, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/04/16
- Re: [Qemu-block] RFC iscsi: set FUA and DPO if !bs->enable_write_cache, Peter Lieven, 2015/04/16
- Re: [Qemu-block] RFC iscsi: set FUA and DPO if !bs->enable_write_cache, Kevin Wolf, 2015/04/16