Re: [PATCH 2/2] hw/sd/sdcard: Do not allow invalid SD card sizes

[Alistair Francis]

On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 6:22 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
>
> QEMU allows to create SD card with unrealistic sizes. This could work,
> but some guests (at least Linux) consider sizes that are not a power
> of 2 as a firmware bug and fix the card size to the next power of 2.
>
> Before CVE-2020-13253 fix, this would allow OOB read/write accesses
> past the image size end.
>
> CVE-2020-13253 has been fixed as:
>
>     Read command is rejected if BLOCK_LEN_ERROR or ADDRESS_ERROR
>     occurred and no data transfer is performed.
>
>     Write command is rejected if BLOCK_LEN_ERROR or ADDRESS_ERROR
>     occurred and no data transfer is performed.
>
>     WP_VIOLATION errors are not modified: the error bit is set, we
>     stay in receive-data state, wait for a stop command. All further
>     data transfer is ignored. See the check on sd->card_status at the
>     beginning of sd_read_data() and sd_write_data().
>
> While this is the correct behavior, in case QEMU create smaller SD
> cards, guests still try to access past the image size end, and QEMU
> considers this is an invalid address, thus "all further data transfer
> is ignored". This is wrong and make the guest looping until
> eventually timeouts.
>
> Fix by not allowing invalid SD card sizes.  Suggesting the expected
> size as a hint:
>
>   $ qemu-system-arm -M orangepi-pc -drive file=rootfs.ext2,if=sd,format=raw
>   qemu-system-arm: Invalid SD card size: 60 MiB (expecting at least 64 MiB)
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
>  hw/sd/sd.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/sd/sd.c b/hw/sd/sd.c
> index cb81487e5c..c45106b78e 100644
> --- a/hw/sd/sd.c
> +++ b/hw/sd/sd.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>
>  #include "qemu/osdep.h"
>  #include "qemu/units.h"
> +#include "qemu/cutils.h"
>  #include "hw/irq.h"
>  #include "hw/registerfields.h"
>  #include "sysemu/block-backend.h"
> @@ -2130,11 +2131,26 @@ static void sd_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>      }
>
>      if (sd->blk) {
> +        int64_t blk_size;
> +
>          if (blk_is_read_only(sd->blk)) {
>              error_setg(errp, "Cannot use read-only drive as SD card");
>              return;
>          }
>
> +        blk_size = blk_getlength(sd->blk);
> +        if (blk_size > 0 && !is_power_of_2(blk_size)) {
> +            int64_t blk_size_aligned = pow2ceil(blk_size);
> +            char *blk_size_str = size_to_str(blk_size);
> +            char *blk_size_aligned_str = size_to_str(blk_size_aligned);
> +
> +            error_setg(errp, "Invalid SD card size: %s (expecting at least 
> %s)",
> +                       blk_size_str, blk_size_aligned_str);

Should we print that we expect a power of 2? This isn't always obvious
from the message.

Alistair

> +            g_free(blk_size_str);
> +            g_free(blk_size_aligned_str);
> +            return;
> +        }
> +
>          ret = blk_set_perm(sd->blk, BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ | 
> BLK_PERM_WRITE,
>                             BLK_PERM_ALL, errp);
>          if (ret < 0) {
> --
> 2.21.3
>
>