qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PULL 0/2] Block patches


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [PULL 0/2] Block patches
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:36:43 +0000

On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 16:28, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 01:17:50PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> > Thanks! My path modifies migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c. qsd-jobs runs 
> > block-commit and block-stream jobs and don't start any kind of migration or 
> > snapshot or savevm, so it seems impossible that qsd-jobs runs the code 
> > touched by my patch..
>
> Confirmed. The failure is not related to this pull request.
>
> I reproduced the same s390x host failure on commit
> 9e2e9fe3df9f539f8b6941ceb96d25355fdae47e (HEAD -> master, tag:
> v6.0.0-rc0, origin/master, origin/HEAD):
>
> qsd-jobs                        fail       [11:04:58] [11:04:58]   0.1s       
>           output mismatch (see qsd-jobs.out.bad)
> --- /root/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/tests/qsd-jobs.out
> +++ qsd-jobs.out.bad
> @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@
>  {"timestamp": {"seconds":  TIMESTAMP, "microseconds":  TIMESTAMP}, "event": 
> "JOB_STATUS_CHANGE", "data": {"status": "created", "id": "job0"}}
>  {"timestamp": {"seconds":  TIMESTAMP, "microseconds":  TIMESTAMP}, "event": 
> "JOB_STATUS_CHANGE", "data": {"status": "running", "id": "job0"}}
>  {"return": {}}
> +{"return": {}}
> +{"timestamp": {"seconds":  TIMESTAMP, "microseconds":  TIMESTAMP}, "event": 
> "JOB_STATUS_CHANGE", "data": {"status": "paused", "id": "job0"}}
> +{"timestamp": {"seconds":  TIMESTAMP, "microseconds":  TIMESTAMP}, "event": 
> "JOB_STATUS_CHANGE", "data": {"status": "running", "id": "job0"}}
>  {"timestamp": {"seconds":  TIMESTAMP, "microseconds":  TIMESTAMP}, "event": 
> "JOB_STATUS_CHANGE", "data": {"status": "ready", "id": "job0"}}
>  {"timestamp": {"seconds":  TIMESTAMP, "microseconds":  TIMESTAMP}, "event": 
> "BLOCK_JOB_READY", "data": {"device": "job0", "len": 0, "offset": 0, "speed": 
> 0, "type": "commit"}}
> -{"return": {}}
> -{"timestamp": {"seconds":  TIMESTAMP, "microseconds":  TIMESTAMP}, "event": 
> "JOB_STATUS_CHANGE", "data": {"status": "standby", "id": "job0"}}
> -{"timestamp": {"seconds":  TIMESTAMP, "microseconds":  TIMESTAMP}, "event": 
> "JOB_STATUS_CHANGE", "data": {"status": "ready", "id": "job0"}}
>  {"timestamp": {"seconds":  TIMESTAMP, "microseconds":  TIMESTAMP}, "event": 
> "JOB_STATUS_CHANGE", "data": {"status": "waiting", "id": "job0"}}
>  {"timestamp": {"seconds":  TIMESTAMP, "microseconds":  TIMESTAMP}, "event": 
> "JOB_STATUS_CHANGE", "data": {"status": "pending", "id": "job0"}}
>  {"timestamp": {"seconds":  TIMESTAMP, "microseconds":  TIMESTAMP}, "event": 
> "BLOCK_JOB_COMPLETED", "data": {"device": "job0", "len": 0, "offset": 0, 
> "speed": 0, "type": "commit"}}
>
> Peter: Please merge this pull request since the failure is pre-existing.

OK, I'll run the pullreq through merge testing again.

Could somebody on the block team look at this s390 host intermittent ?

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]