qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 30/51] tests: Skip iotests and qtest when '--without-default-


From: Bin Meng
Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/51] tests: Skip iotests and qtest when '--without-default-devices'
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 23:18:30 +0800

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 8:04 PM Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 24/08/2022 11.40, Bin Meng wrote:
> > From: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
> >
> > When QEMU is configured with '--without-default-devices', we should
> > not build and run iotests and qtest because devices used by these
> > test cases are not built in.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
> > ---
> >
> >   tests/qemu-iotests/meson.build | 5 +++++
> >   tests/qtest/meson.build        | 5 +++++
> >   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/meson.build b/tests/qemu-iotests/meson.build
> > index 323a4acb6a..38d9a874d2 100644
> > --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/meson.build
> > +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/meson.build
> > @@ -2,6 +2,11 @@ if not have_tools or targetos == 'windows' or 
> > get_option('gprof')
> >     subdir_done()
> >   endif
> >
> > +# Skip iotests if configured without a default selection of devices
> > +if not get_option('default_devices')
> > +  subdir_done()
> > +endif
> > +
> >   foreach cflag: config_host['QEMU_CFLAGS'].split()
> >     if cflag.startswith('-fsanitize') and \
> >        not cflag.contains('safe-stack') and not cflag.contains('cfi-icall')
> > diff --git a/tests/qtest/meson.build b/tests/qtest/meson.build
> > index c97da5a062..0291b3966c 100644
> > --- a/tests/qtest/meson.build
> > +++ b/tests/qtest/meson.build
> > @@ -4,6 +4,11 @@ if not config_host.has_key('CONFIG_POSIX')
> >     subdir_done()
> >   endif
> >
> > +# Skip QTests if configured without a default selection of devices
> > +if not get_option('default_devices')
> > +  subdir_done()
> > +endif
> > +
> >   slow_qtests = {
> >     'ahci-test' : 60,
> >     'bios-tables-test' : 120,
>
> That's a very big hammer already ... I'd prefer if we could work on the
> tests instead to adapt for the availability of devices instead (we've done
> quite a lot of work in this area in the past already, but apparently still
> not enough yet ...)

Adapting tests for the availability of devices is a large scope. I may
not have time to work on this.

I will have to drop this patch in v2, and adjust the patches in the
series to keep bisectability then.

Regards,
Bin



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]