Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Clarify error message when a PCI slot is already in use (v2)

[Markus Armbruster]

"Daniel P. Berrange" <address@hidden> writes:

> When mistakenly configuring two devices in the same PCI slot,
> QEMU gives a not entirely obvious message about a 'devfn' being
> in use:
>
> $ qemu -device rtl8139 -device virtio-balloon-pci,bus=pci.0,addr=0x3
> qemu-kvm: -device virtio-balloon-pci,bus=pci.0,addr=0x3: PCI: devfn 24 not 
> available for virtio-balloon-pci, in use by rtl8139
>
> The user does not configure 'devfn' numbers, they use slot+function.
> Thus the error messages should be reported back to the user with that
> same terminology rather than the internal QEMU terminology. This
> patch makes it report:
>
> $ qemu -device rtl8139 -device virtio-balloon-pci,bus=pci.0,addr=0x3
> qemu: -device virtio-balloon-pci,bus=pci.0,addr=0x3.7: PCI: slot 3 function 0 
> not available for virtio-balloon-pci, in use by rtl8139
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/pci.c |    6 +++---
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/pci.c b/hw/pci.c
> index cbbd1dd..cd7ce8d 100644
> --- a/hw/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/pci.c
> @@ -609,12 +609,12 @@ static PCIDevice *do_pci_register_device(PCIDevice 
> *pci_dev, PCIBus *bus,
>              if (!bus->devices[devfn])
>                  goto found;
>          }
> -        error_report("PCI: no devfn available for %s, all in use", name);
> +        error_report("PCI: no slot/function available for %s, all in use", 
> name);
>          return NULL;
>      found: ;
>      } else if (bus->devices[devfn]) {
> -        error_report("PCI: devfn %d not available for %s, in use by %s",
> -                     devfn, name, bus->devices[devfn]->name);
> +        error_report("PCI: slot %d function %d not available for %s, in use 
> by %s",
> +                     PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn), name, 
> bus->devices[devfn]->name);
>          return NULL;
>      }
>      pci_dev->bus = bus;

Long lines without true need.  Do we care?  Looks good otherwise.