On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 02:57:45PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 09:49:16PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 02:11:29PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 03:08:59PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > > Use _RMV method to indicate whether device can be removed.
> > > >
> > > > Data is retrieved from QEMU via I/O port 0xae0c.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti<address@hidden>
> > >
> > > Thanks Marcelo,
> > >
> > > Can you add acked-bys from the qemu/kvm maintaners?
> > >
> > Marcelo is kvm maintainer ;) FWIW I tested this with Windows 7& XP
> > and it works as expected. The patch relies on patch not yes excepted
> > to qemu though.
>
> Yeah - I know - but I figured I'd ask for concensus before committing.
> :-)
>
> The committing of seabios patches that have a dependency on qemu/kvm
> is an area that I think could be better clarified. I'm thinking that
> if the seabios part depends on something in qemu/kvm then we should
> have the corresponding kvm/qemu maintaners "ack" it.
>
> -Kevin
Avi, are you OK with this patch ?
Yes, perhaps it all (including PCI hotplug controller) should be using
something else than hardcoded IO ports, but thats what we have now.