[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] libqblock draft code v1
From: |
Stefan Hajnoczi |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] libqblock draft code v1 |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 11:18:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 07:25:54AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 08/01/2012 06:49 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Wenchao Xia <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> This patch encapsulate qemu general block layer to provide block
> >> services. API are declared in libqblock.h. libqblock-test.c
> >> simulate library consumer's behaviors. Make libqblock-test could
> >> build the code.
> >> For easy this patch does not form a dynamic libarary yet.
> >>
> >> +++ b/libqblock-test.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
> >> +#include "libqblock.h"
> >
> > Please include GPLv2+ license headers in new source files you create.
> > See existing code like include/qemu/object.h for the license header
> > text.
>
> Actually, LGPLv2+ (or compatible, like BSD), if you plan on making this
> a reusable library. GPLv2+ is too strict for libvirt to use directly.
Good point, I was only looking at libqblock-test.c but for the header
file and library could we definitely need LGPLv2+. It makes sense for
the whole thing to be LGPLv2+.
Stefan
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] libqblock draft code v1, Wenchao Xia, 2012/08/02
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] libqblock draft code v1, Blue Swirl, 2012/08/01