[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/15] atomic: introduce atomic operations
From: |
Stefan Hajnoczi |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/15] atomic: introduce atomic operations |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Aug 2012 14:09:25 +0100 |
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 8 August 2012 07:25, Liu Ping Fan <address@hidden> wrote:
>> +static inline void atomic_sub(int i, Atomic *v)
>> +{
>> + asm volatile("lock; subl %1,%0"
>> + : "+m" (v->counter)
>> + : "ir" (i));
>> +}
>
> NAK. We don't want random inline assembly implementations of locking
> primitives in QEMU, they are way too hard to keep working with all the
> possible host architectures we support. I spent some time a while back
> getting rid of the (variously busted) versions we had previously.
>
> If you absolutely must use atomic ops, use the gcc builtins. For
> preference, stick to higher level and less error-prone abstractions.
We're spoilt for choice here:
1. Atomic built-ins from gcc
2. glib atomics
No need to roll our own or copy the implementation from the kernel.
Stefan
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/15] qom: using atomic ops to re-implement object_ref, Liu Ping Fan, 2012/08/08
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/15] qom: introduce reclaimer to release obj, Liu Ping Fan, 2012/08/08