[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure: some fixes for OpenBSD
From: |
Brad Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure: some fixes for OpenBSD |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:15:20 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 02:02:57PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 24/08/2012 14:00, Brad Smith ha scritto:
> >>>>> > >> > OpenBSD's uname works as expected with the -s flag so remove the
> >>>>> > >> > special
> >>>>> > >> > handling when determining the target OS. Use arch -s to retrieve
> >>>>> > >> > the
> >>>>> > >> > hardware architecture as uname -m will return the meta
> >>>>> > >> > architecture
> >>>>> > >> > instead of the hardware architecture (.e.g. macppc vs powerpc).
> >>> > > I'm afraid I think this patch is moving in the wrong direction.
> >>> > > Wherever possible we should be using compiler checks like
> >>> > > check_define,
> >>> > > not looking at the output of 'uname' and the like. The former will
> >>> > > work when cross compiling, and the latter will give the wrong answers.
> >>> > > In some places we have that kind of 'look at uname/etc' check but
> >>> > > we should be trying to reduce and eliminate it where possible.
> >> >
> >> > Right, we should support GNU triplets and a --host argument, and replace
> >> > uname checks with pattern matching on the triplet.
> > That still requires a means of generating that triplet in the first place.
>
> That's what GNU config.guess is for, but it is only used in the
> non-cross-compilation case. QEMU's homegrown configure hardly
> distinguishes between native and cross builds.
OK well if you're going in that direction that's fine as config.guess
knows how to do the right thing.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.