[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3, ping] SMBIOS cleanup round
From: |
Gabriel L. Somlo |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3, ping] SMBIOS cleanup round |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:13:18 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Hi,
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:44:48PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:09:52AM -0400, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> > Changelog:
> >
> > new in v4:
> > - slightly improved commit blurbs
> >
> > v3:
> > - endian-ness fix (1/3) now correctly handles cpuid version and features
> > - included documentation (qemu-options.hx) for type 0 uefi flag (2/3)
> > - fixed type 17 field sizes ("word" means 16 bits, not 32 :) :)
> >
> >
> > v2:
> > - fix endian-ness for *all* larger-than-8bit fields (patch 1/2)
> > - resubmit type0 update (2/2) with appropriate endian-ness fix
> > for 64-bit field.
> >
>
> Thanks!
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/350248/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/350253/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/350252/
Not sure where we left this, was somebody going to pull these, or are
we waiting for the unit tests:
> One question: we don't seem to have unit-test for this
> interface in qemu, do we?
> I would like to see at least a basic test along the lines of
> tests/acpi-test.c: run bios to load tables from QEMU,
> then do some basic checks on the tables that bios loaded.
... in which case:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/353072/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/353073/
Wondering if I should send out another series containing all five, or
if the first three are already "accepted", in which case "ping" only
on the latter two :)
Thanks much,
--Gabriel
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3, ping] SMBIOS cleanup round,
Gabriel L. Somlo <=