[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 4/4] vfio: Enable for SPAPR
From: |
Alex Williamson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 4/4] vfio: Enable for SPAPR |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Jun 2014 08:28:13 -0600 |
On Sun, 2014-06-08 at 09:49 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 06/07/2014 08:47 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > On 06/07/2014 02:57 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 13:34 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >>> This turns the sPAPR support on and enables VFIO container use
> >>> in the kernel.
> >>>
> >>> This extends vfio_connect_container to support VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU type
> >>> in the host kernel.
> >>>
> >>> This registers a memory listener which sPAPR IOMMU will notify when
> >>> executing H_PUT_TCE/etc DMA calls. The listener then will notify the host
> >>> kernel about DMA map/unmap operation via VFIO_IOMMU_MAP_DMA/
> >>> VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA ioctls.
> >>>
> >>> This executes VFIO_IOMMU_ENABLE ioctl to make sure that the IOMMU is free
> >>> of mappings and can be exclusively given to the user. At the moment SPAPR
> >>> is the only platform requiring this call to be implemented.
> >>>
> >>> Note that the host kernel function implementing VFIO_IOMMU_DISABLE
> >>> is called automatically when container's fd is closed so there is
> >>> no need to call it explicitly from QEMU. This may change in the future.
> >>
> >> So you're saying we rely on a behavior that may change in the future...
> >> The kernel must do cleanup, it can never rely on userspace to do the
> >> right thing or we have a bug. Does that mean we can remove the "may
> >> change in the future" part of this comment or is that directed at QEMU's
> >> behavior and not the kernel's?
> >
> >
> > I wanted to say that if/when we support PCI hotplug or dynamic IOMMU group
> > reconfiguration (we might be able to do so in POWER9 or later, do not know
> > details), we will call DISABLE explicitly.
>
>
> Any better?
> ===
> Note that the host kernel function implementing VFIO_IOMMU_DISABLE
> is called automatically when container's fd is closed so there is
> no need to call it explicitly from QEMU. We may need to call
> VFIO_IOMMU_DISABLE explicitely in the future for some sort of dynamic
> reconfiguration (PCI hotplug or dynamic IOMMU group management).
> ===
That sounds better. I'd also appreciate a comment in the code where
enable is called stating that disable is implicit in closing the
container fd. Thanks,
Alex
> >
> >> A comment in the code where we setup the
> >> release handler or call ENABLE would be a good idea too. Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Alex
> >>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
> >>> ---
> >>> Changes:
> >>> v8:
> >>> * added note about VFIO_IOMMU_DISABLE in the commit log
> >>>
> >>> v7:
> >>> * added more details in commit log
> >>>
> >>> v5:
> >>> * multiple returns converted to gotos
> >>>
> >>> v4:
> >>> * fixed format string to use %m which is a glibc extension:
> >>> "Print output of strerror(errno). No argument is required."
> >>> ---
> >>> hw/misc/vfio.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/hw/misc/vfio.c b/hw/misc/vfio.c
> >>> index bb77934..78d2045 100644
> >>> --- a/hw/misc/vfio.c
> >>> +++ b/hw/misc/vfio.c
> >>> @@ -3650,6 +3650,34 @@ static int vfio_connect_container(VFIOGroup
> >>> *group, AddressSpace *as)
> >>>
> >>> container->iommu_data.type1.initialized = true;
> >>>
> >>> + } else if (ioctl(fd, VFIO_CHECK_EXTENSION, VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU)) {
> >>> + ret = ioctl(group->fd, VFIO_GROUP_SET_CONTAINER, &fd);
> >>> + if (ret) {
> >>> + error_report("vfio: failed to set group container: %m");
> >>> + ret = -errno;
> >>> + goto free_container_exit;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = ioctl(fd, VFIO_SET_IOMMU, VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU);
> >>> + if (ret) {
> >>> + error_report("vfio: failed to set iommu for container: %m");
> >>> + ret = -errno;
> >>> + goto free_container_exit;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = ioctl(fd, VFIO_IOMMU_ENABLE);
> >>> + if (ret) {
> >>> + error_report("vfio: failed to enable container: %m");
> >>> + ret = -errno;
> >>> + goto free_container_exit;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + container->iommu_data.type1.listener = vfio_memory_listener;
> >>> + container->iommu_data.release = vfio_listener_release;
> >>> +
> >>> + memory_listener_register(&container->iommu_data.type1.listener,
> >>> + container->space->as);
> >>> +
> >>> } else {
> >>> error_report("vfio: No available IOMMU models");
> >>> ret = -EINVAL;
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 2/4] vfio: Add vfio_container_ioctl(), (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 2/4] vfio: Add vfio_container_ioctl(), Alexey Kardashevskiy, 2014/06/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 2/4] vfio: Add vfio_container_ioctl(), Alex Williamson, 2014/06/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 2/4] vfio: Add vfio_container_ioctl(), Alexey Kardashevskiy, 2014/06/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 2/4] vfio: Add vfio_container_ioctl(), Alex Williamson, 2014/06/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 2/4] vfio: Add vfio_container_ioctl(), Alexey Kardashevskiy, 2014/06/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 2/4] vfio: Add vfio_container_ioctl(), Alex Williamson, 2014/06/09
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 4/4] vfio: Enable for SPAPR, Alexey Kardashevskiy, 2014/06/05
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 3/4] spapr_pci_vfio: Add spapr-pci-vfio-host-bridge to support vfio, Alexey Kardashevskiy, 2014/06/05