[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/8] virtio: add endian-ambivalent support t
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/8] virtio: add endian-ambivalent support to VirtIODevice |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jun 2014 13:59:59 +0300 |
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:50:56PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 12:39:27 +0200
> Alexander Graf <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > > Am 12.06.2014 um 12:14 schrieb Greg Kurz <address@hidden>:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:43:20 +0200
> > > Alexander Graf <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>> On 12.06.14 11:39, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > >>> Il 12/06/2014 11:37, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> > >>>> Maybe just drop unnecessary stuff for new machine types?
> > >>>> Then we won't need hacks to migrate it.
> > >>>
> > >>> For any machine type it's trivial to migrate it. All machine types
> > >>> including old ones can disregard the migrated values.
> > >>
> > >> How about a patch like this before the actual LE awareness ones? With
> > >> this we should make virtio-serial config space completely independent of
> > >> live migration.
> > >>
> > >> Also since QEMU versions that do read these swapped values during
> > >> migration are not bi-endian aware, we can never get into a case where a
> > >> cross-endian save needs to be considered ;).
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Alex
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/hw/char/virtio-serial-bus.c b/hw/char/virtio-serial-bus.c
> > >> index 2b647b6..73cb9b7 100644
> > >> --- a/hw/char/virtio-serial-bus.c
> > >> +++ b/hw/char/virtio-serial-bus.c
> > >> @@ -670,6 +670,7 @@ static int virtio_serial_load(QEMUFile *f, void
> > >> *opaque, int version_id)
> > >> uint32_t max_nr_ports, nr_active_ports, ports_map;
> > >> unsigned int i;
> > >> int ret;
> > >> + uint32_t tmp;
> > >>
> > >> if (version_id > 3) {
> > >> return -EINVAL;
> > >> @@ -685,17 +686,12 @@ static int virtio_serial_load(QEMUFile *f, void
> > >> *opaque, int version_id)
> > >> return 0;
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> - /* The config space */
> > >> - qemu_get_be16s(f, &s->config.cols);
> > >> - qemu_get_be16s(f, &s->config.rows);
> > >> -
> > >> - qemu_get_be32s(f, &max_nr_ports);
> > >> - tswap32s(&max_nr_ports);
> > >> - if (max_nr_ports > tswap32(s->config.max_nr_ports)) {
> > >> - /* Source could have had more ports than us. Fail migration. */
> > >> - return -EINVAL;
> > >> - }
> > >> + /* Unused */
> > >> + qemu_get_be16s(f, &tmp);
> > >> + qemu_get_be16s(f, &tmp);
> > >> + qemu_get_be32s(f, &tmp);
> > >>
> > >> + max_nr_ports = tswap32(s->config.max_nr_ports);
> > >> for (i = 0; i < (max_nr_ports + 31) / 32; i++) {
> > >> qemu_get_be32s(f, &ports_map);
> > >
> > > For the moment, we have 0 < max_nr_ports < 32 so the source
> > > machine only stores a single 32 bit value... If this limit
> > > gets raised, we can end up sending more than that... and
> > > only the source machine max_nr_ports value can give the
> > > information...
> >
> > Why? This value only ever gets set in realize, so it will not change during
> > the lifetime of the device - which means we don't need to migrate it.
> >
>
> I agree with the fact that the value does not change and should not be
> migrated in the first place.
> I am just worried about the size of the active ports bitmap that is streamed
> in the for loop... it
> is only 32 bit as of today, because we are limited to 32 ports. How would
> this work if the limit is
> raised ? How can the destination machine know how many bits have to be read ?
When the destination machine is started with -M 2.1, it
knows that it has to read 32 bit.
If started with -M 3.0 it reads in 42 bits :)
> --
> Gregory Kurz address@hidden
> address@hidden
> Software Engineer @ IBM/Meiosys http://www.ibm.com
> Tel +33 (0)562 165 496
>
> "Anarchy is about taking complete responsibility for yourself."
> Alan Moore.
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/8] virtio: add endian-ambivalent support to VirtIODevice, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/8] virtio: add endian-ambivalent support to VirtIODevice, Alexander Graf, 2014/06/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/8] virtio: add endian-ambivalent support to VirtIODevice, Greg Kurz, 2014/06/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/8] virtio: add endian-ambivalent support to VirtIODevice, Paolo Bonzini, 2014/06/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/8] virtio: add endian-ambivalent support to VirtIODevice, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2014/06/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/8] virtio: add endian-ambivalent support to VirtIODevice, Paolo Bonzini, 2014/06/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/8] virtio: add endian-ambivalent support to VirtIODevice, Alexander Graf, 2014/06/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/8] virtio: add endian-ambivalent support to VirtIODevice, Greg Kurz, 2014/06/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/8] virtio: add endian-ambivalent support to VirtIODevice, Alexander Graf, 2014/06/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/8] virtio: add endian-ambivalent support to VirtIODevice, Greg Kurz, 2014/06/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/8] virtio: add endian-ambivalent support to VirtIODevice, Alexander Graf, 2014/06/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/8] virtio: add endian-ambivalent support to VirtIODevice,
Michael S. Tsirkin <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/8] virtio: add endian-ambivalent support to VirtIODevice, Greg Kurz, 2014/06/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/8] virtio: add endian-ambivalent support to VirtIODevice, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2014/06/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/8] virtio: add endian-ambivalent support to VirtIODevice, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2014/06/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/8] virtio: add endian-ambivalent support to VirtIODevice, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2014/06/12