qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/16] NUMA series v5


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/16] NUMA series v5
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 11:54:17 +0300

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:49:18PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:18:44AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 13/06/2014 10:03, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> > >>>> > Two points I would like to see addressed before it's going upstream:
> > >>>> >      - please validate and test the pci branch
> > >>>> >        there have been lots of changes
> > >>>> >      - please work to drop the SignedRange: for all
> > >>>> >        current purposes existing Range is sufficient,
> > >>>> >        instead of a list and sort re-implementation, it is
> > >>>> >        better to use g_list_insert_sorted
> > >>>
> > >>> I see. Thanks for your work!
> > >Could you confirm you'll be able to fix these by Monday?
> > >I'd like to send the pull request then.
> > 
> > I think SignedRange can be dealt with after the merge.
> > 
> > Paolo
> 
> I agree. Using existing Range makes string output visitor don't support
> negative values which it does support before SignedRange.

Are there any users though? I think it's more a bug than a feature.
Also we do want to get rid of rewriting g_list_insert_sorted though, that's
for sure.

> Besides SignedRange, tests show that there are several problems with the
> pci tree(core dumps, unexpecting exit of qemu).
> 
> Hu

OK pls share this info, also pls bisect if possible.

Thanks!

-- 
MST



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]