In fact I do ask them for anything(binaries /source codes/diff to QEMU) to verify their result,but I have got no any reply from their funny group.Maybe I should write comments to the journal (and) to request sth. for verifing.Or someone in their group can see this letter in maillist.
Many papers said they can acclerate QEMU in a huge boost.(20x,e.g.)I read their papers carefully in order to find codes which are changed in their work.Let's take this paper for example. they published their work first on CGO'12(HQEMU: A Multi-Threaded and Retargetable Dynamic Binary Translator on Multicores).In their work,a counter was added in every basic block to detect hot traces.It's funny that they put this counter in their final codes as they said.They told us that HQEMU runs faster than QEMU.I myself added a counter just like theirs only for profiling.QEMU would run very very slow after putting a counter in every block . So I wanted to know how they overcome this. After waiting for 2 years,I found this paper published on I3E Trans. So I asked for sth. to verify again but still no reply....