[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/15] target-arm: Correct check for non-EL3
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/15] target-arm: Correct check for non-EL3 |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Jun 2015 21:26:02 +0100 |
On 1 June 2015 at 21:10, John Snow <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> On 05/29/2015 02:43 AM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
>> From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <address@hidden>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> target-arm/op_helper.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target-arm/op_helper.c b/target-arm/op_helper.c
>> index 3f5b9ab..7583ae7 100644
>> --- a/target-arm/op_helper.c
>> +++ b/target-arm/op_helper.c
>> @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ void HELPER(access_check_cp_reg)(CPUARMState *env, void
>> *rip, uint32_t syndrome)
>> /* Requesting a trap to EL2 when we're in EL3 or S-EL0/1 is
>> * a bug in the access function.
>> */
>> - assert(!arm_is_secure(env) && !arm_current_el(env) == 3);
>> + assert(!arm_is_secure(env) && arm_current_el(env) != 3);
>> target_el = 2;
>> break;
>> case CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL3:
>>
>
> This patch could even be liberated from this series if it hasn't been
> already, since the clang build is currently broken with -Werror without
> this fix.
Only clang 3.5, I suspect -- my clang build uses Werror but it's
an older clang. I have queued the first half of this series into
target-arm.next anyway (might directly apply this one as a buildfix).
-- PMM