[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] arm: Fix invalid assert logic in
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] arm: Fix invalid assert logic in op_helper.c |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Jun 2015 09:55:21 +0100 |
On 2 June 2015 at 09:52, Michael Tokarev <address@hidden> wrote:
> 02.06.2015 11:10, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 2 June 2015 at 09:05, Martin Kletzander <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Boolean value '!arm_current_el(env)' can never be equal to 3. Fix it
>>> according to the comment above as currently the build fails with
>>> gcc-5.1.0.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>> target-arm/op_helper.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/target-arm/op_helper.c b/target-arm/op_helper.c
>>> index 3f5b9ab5963b..7583ae71217b 100644
>>> --- a/target-arm/op_helper.c
>>> +++ b/target-arm/op_helper.c
>>> @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ void HELPER(access_check_cp_reg)(CPUARMState *env, void
>>> *rip, uint32_t syndrome)
>>> /* Requesting a trap to EL2 when we're in EL3 or S-EL0/1 is
>>> * a bug in the access function.
>>> */
>>> - assert(!arm_is_secure(env) && !arm_current_el(env) == 3);
>>> + assert(!arm_is_secure(env) && arm_current_el(env) != 3);
>>> target_el = 2;
>>> break;
>>> case CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL3:
>>
>> Thanks, but there are already two versions of this patch on the list.
>
> Hm. So why are you sending it to -trivial, while neither of the
> 3 versions has been sent there?
>
> I found this:
>
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <address@hidden>
> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/15] target-arm: Correct check for non-EL3
> Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 16:43:13 +1000
>
> Launchpad #1460523
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1460523
>
> Message-Id: <address@hidden>
> From: Leon Yu <address@hidden>
> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-arm: fix incorrect assertion in
> access_check_cp_reg helper
> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 12:27:12 +0000
>
> And this incarnation.
>
> Maybe I should queue one of these to -trivial, is it what you mean?
I'm planning to apply Edgar's patch direct to master as a buildfix today.
-- PMM