[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-arm: fix incorrect assertion in access_c
From: |
Leon Yu |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-arm: fix incorrect assertion in access_check_cp_reg helper |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Jun 2015 22:05:14 +0800 |
Argh, that fix is cleaner and I should have checked patchwork first.
Lesson learned, thanks.
-Leon
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 1 June 2015 at 13:27, Leon Yu <address@hidden> wrote:
>> as comparing boolean with constant 3 is always false.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Leon Yu <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> target-arm/op_helper.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target-arm/op_helper.c b/target-arm/op_helper.c
>> index 3f5b9ab..30f2374 100644
>> --- a/target-arm/op_helper.c
>> +++ b/target-arm/op_helper.c
>> @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ void HELPER(access_check_cp_reg)(CPUARMState *env, void
>> *rip, uint32_t syndrome)
>> /* Requesting a trap to EL2 when we're in EL3 or S-EL0/1 is
>> * a bug in the access function.
>> */
>> - assert(!arm_is_secure(env) && !arm_current_el(env) == 3);
>> + assert(!arm_is_secure(env) && !(arm_current_el(env) == 3));
>> target_el = 2;
>> break;
>
> Yep. There's a fix onlist already:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/477597/
>
> thanks
> -- PMM