qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/8] spapr: Consider max_cpus during xics ini


From: Bharata B Rao
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/8] spapr: Consider max_cpus during xics initialization
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 12:37:58 +0530
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 03:30:24PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 06/05/2015 02:25 PM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> >Use max_cpus instead of smp_cpus when intializating xics system. Also
> >report max_cpus in ibm,interrupt-server-ranges device tree property of
> >interrupt controller node.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <address@hidden>
> >---
> >  hw/ppc/spapr.c | 7 +++----
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> >index acc7233..9270234 100644
> >--- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> >+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> >@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static void *spapr_create_fdt_skel(hwaddr initrd_base,
> >      GString *hypertas = g_string_sized_new(256);
> >      GString *qemu_hypertas = g_string_sized_new(256);
> >      uint32_t refpoints[] = {cpu_to_be32(0x4), cpu_to_be32(0x4)};
> >-    uint32_t interrupt_server_ranges_prop[] = {0, cpu_to_be32(smp_cpus)};
> >+    uint32_t interrupt_server_ranges_prop[] = {0, cpu_to_be32(max_cpus)};
> >      int smt = kvmppc_smt_threads();
> >      unsigned char vec5[] = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x80};
> >      QemuOpts *opts = qemu_opts_find(qemu_find_opts("smp-opts"), NULL);
> >@@ -1454,9 +1454,8 @@ static void ppc_spapr_init(MachineState *machine)
> >
> >      /* Set up Interrupt Controller before we create the VCPUs */
> >      spapr->icp = xics_system_init(machine,
> >-                                  DIV_ROUND_UP(smp_cpus * 
> >kvmppc_smt_threads(),
> >-                                               smp_threads),
> >-                                  XICS_IRQS);
> >+                                  DIV_ROUND_UP(max_cpus * 
> >kvmppc_smt_threads(),
> >+                                               smp_threads), XICS_IRQS);
> 
> 
> Please do not change the formatting of "XICS_IRQS);".

Hmmm why ? I thought I saved a line!

Again checkpatch.pl doesn't complain.

Regards,
Bharata.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]