[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] virtio: inline private qdev properties into
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] virtio: inline private qdev properties into virtio devices |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:36:02 +0200 |
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:28:21PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>
>
> On 2015/6/10 22:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:38:24PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>On 2015/6/10 21:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:18:27PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> >>>>Ping?
> >>>>Have these patches been missed?
> >>>
> >>>I see them upstream. See e.g. da3e8a23492dbc13c4b70d90b6ae42970624e63a.
> >>>What's missing?
> >>>
> >>
> >>da3e8a23492dbc13c4b70d90b6ae42970624e63a is "virtio-net: Move
> >>DEFINE_VIRTIO_NET_FEATURES to virtio-net", not this patchset.
> >
> >Oh right, I just saw Cornelia sent a minor comment which wasn't
> >addressed.
> >
> Yeah, and I ask whether it needs to repin. Could you help deal the
> indentations?
Sorry I can't. Too many patches flying around, trying to make 2.4.
> >Also, I'd rather this is rebased on top of Gerd's virtio 1 tree -
> >I plan to merge them today.
> >
>
> I pull master, apply Gerd's virtio-1 patchset "[PATCH 00/33] virtio 1.0
> patch series rebased", then apply these patches. No conflicts and compile
> pass. I guess you could apply these directly.
>
> PS: The [PATCH 01/33] of Gerd's virtio-1 patchset is already in master.
Thanks.
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Shannon