[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] spapr: convert slot name property to num
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] spapr: convert slot name property to numeric core and links |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Mar 2016 10:27:28 +0100 |
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 20:39:39 +0530
Bharata B Rao <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 02:18:12PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > it's just a hack to get qiuck swith to numeric core id
> > should be split and merged in patches
> > introducing modified code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > hw/cpu/core.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > hw/ppc/spapr.c | 39 ++-------------------------------------
> > hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 25 ++-----------------------
> > include/hw/cpu/core.h | 4 ++--
> > 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/cpu/core.c b/hw/cpu/core.c
> > index d8caf37..90a9408 100644
> > --- a/hw/cpu/core.c
> > +++ b/hw/cpu/core.c
> > @@ -7,25 +7,39 @@
> > * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> > */
> > #include "hw/cpu/core.h"
> > +#include "qapi/visitor.h"
> >
> > -static char *core_prop_get_slot(Object *obj, Error **errp)
> > +static void core_prop_get_core(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
> > + const char *name, void *opaque,
> > + Error **errp)
> > {
> > - CPUCore *core = CPU_CORE(obj);
> > + CPUCore *cc = CPU_CORE(obj);
> > + int64_t value = cc->core;
> >
> > - return g_strdup(core->slot);
> > + visit_type_int(v, name, &value, errp);
> > }
> >
> > -static void core_prop_set_slot(Object *obj, const char *val, Error **errp)
> > +static void core_prop_set_core(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
> > + const char *name, void *opaque,
> > + Error **errp)
> > {
> > - CPUCore *core = CPU_CORE(obj);
> > -
> > - core->slot = g_strdup(val);
> > + CPUCore *cc = CPU_CORE(obj);
> > + Error *local_err = NULL;
> > + int64_t value;
> > +
> > + visit_type_int(v, name, &value, &local_err);
> > + if (local_err) {
> > + error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + cc->core = value;
> > }
> >
> > static void cpu_core_instance_init(Object *obj)
> > {
> > - object_property_add_str(obj, "slot", core_prop_get_slot,
> > core_prop_set_slot,
> > - NULL);
> > + object_property_add(obj, CPU_CORE_ID_PROP, "int",
> > + core_prop_get_core, core_prop_set_core,
> > + NULL, NULL, NULL);
> > }
> >
> > static const TypeInfo cpu_core_type_info = {
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > index 6173c1b..6890a44 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > @@ -1755,28 +1755,6 @@ static void spapr_validate_node_memory(MachineState
> > *machine, Error **errp)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -/*
> > - * Check to see if core is being hot-plugged into an already populated
> > slot.
> > - */
> > -static void spapr_cpu_core_allow_set_link(Object *obj, const char *name,
> > - Object *val, Error **errp)
> > -{
> > - Object *core = object_property_get_link(qdev_get_machine(), name,
> > NULL);
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Allow the link to be unset when the core is unplugged.
> > - */
> > - if (!val) {
> > - return;
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (core) {
> > - char *path = object_get_canonical_path(core);
> > - error_setg(errp, "Slot %s already populated with %s", name, path);
> > - g_free(path);
> > - }
> > -}
> > -
> > /* pSeries LPAR / sPAPR hardware init */
> > static void ppc_spapr_init(MachineState *machine)
> > {
> > @@ -1884,21 +1862,8 @@ static void ppc_spapr_init(MachineState *machine)
> > spapr->cores = g_new0(Object *, spapr_max_cores);
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < spapr_max_cores; i++) {
> > - char name[32];
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Create links from machine objects to all possible cores.
> > - */
> > - snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s[%d]",
> > SPAPR_MACHINE_CPU_CORE_PROP, i);
> > - object_property_add_link(OBJECT(spapr), name, TYPE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE,
> > - (Object **)&spapr->cores[i],
> > - spapr_cpu_core_allow_set_link,
> > - OBJ_PROP_LINK_UNREF_ON_RELEASE,
> > - &error_fatal);
>
> With the removal of this link, I don't see any code that explicitly sets
> spapr->cores[i] on which you depend upon. However I can add that when I
> absorb required bits from this patchset to my sPAPR hotplug series if
> this is the agreed way forward.
yep, that's need to be fixed, thanks for noticing
>
> Regards,
> Bharata.
>