[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: assert that KVM_GET/SET_MSRS can s
From: |
Laszlo Ersek |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: assert that KVM_GET/SET_MSRS can set all requested MSRs |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:01:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 |
On 03/30/16 22:59, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> This would have caught the bug in the previous patch.
Should this patch share a series with
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/404245>? Otherwise
they could be separated by other patches in the commit history, and then
"previous patch" would be misleading.
(Alternatively, the reference to "previous patch" could be made by subject.)
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> ---
> target-i386/kvm.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-i386/kvm.c b/target-i386/kvm.c
> index 19e2d94..799fdfa 100644
> --- a/target-i386/kvm.c
> +++ b/target-i386/kvm.c
> @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ static int kvm_get_tsc(CPUState *cs)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + assert(ret == 1);
> env->tsc = msr_data.entries[0].data;
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1446,6 +1447,7 @@ static int kvm_put_tscdeadline_msr(X86CPU *cpu)
> struct kvm_msr_entry entries[1];
> } msr_data;
> struct kvm_msr_entry *msrs = msr_data.entries;
> + int ret;
>
> if (!has_msr_tsc_deadline) {
> return 0;
> @@ -1457,7 +1459,13 @@ static int kvm_put_tscdeadline_msr(X86CPU *cpu)
> .nmsrs = 1,
> };
>
> - return kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_SET_MSRS, &msr_data);
> + ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_SET_MSRS, &msr_data);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + assert(ret == 1);
> + return 0;
> }
This changes the return value of kvm_put_tscdeadline_msr() -- and
friends below -- for successful invocations. I guess that's fine, but a
note about it in the commit message would be nice.
Anyway, I'm not an "expert" in this area, so the best I can offer for
this two-part (almost-) series, with the commit message nits fixed, is
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>
Thanks
Laszlo
>
> /*
> @@ -1472,6 +1480,11 @@ static int kvm_put_msr_feature_control(X86CPU *cpu)
> struct kvm_msrs info;
> struct kvm_msr_entry entry;
> } msr_data;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!has_msr_feature_control) {
> + return 0;
> + }
>
> kvm_msr_entry_set(&msr_data.entry, MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL,
> cpu->env.msr_ia32_feature_control);
> @@ -1480,7 +1493,13 @@ static int kvm_put_msr_feature_control(X86CPU *cpu)
> .nmsrs = 1,
> };
>
> - return kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_SET_MSRS, &msr_data);
> + ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_SET_MSRS, &msr_data);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + assert(ret == 1);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int kvm_put_msrs(X86CPU *cpu, int level)
> @@ -1492,6 +1511,7 @@ static int kvm_put_msrs(X86CPU *cpu, int level)
> } msr_data;
> struct kvm_msr_entry *msrs = msr_data.entries;
> int n = 0, i;
> + int ret;
>
> kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS, env->sysenter_cs);
> kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_ESP, env->sysenter_esp);
> @@ -1685,8 +1705,13 @@ static int kvm_put_msrs(X86CPU *cpu, int level)
> .nmsrs = n,
> };
>
> - return kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_SET_MSRS, &msr_data);
> + ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_SET_MSRS, &msr_data);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> + assert(ret == n);
> + return 0;
> }
>
>
> @@ -2055,6 +2080,7 @@ static int kvm_get_msrs(X86CPU *cpu)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + assert(ret == n);
> for (i = 0; i < ret; i++) {
> uint32_t index = msrs[i].index;
> switch (index) {
> @@ -2511,7 +2537,7 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cpu, int level)
>
> assert(cpu_is_stopped(cpu) || qemu_cpu_is_self(cpu));
>
> - if (level >= KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE && has_msr_feature_control) {
> + if (level >= KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE) {
> ret = kvm_put_msr_feature_control(x86_cpu);
> if (ret < 0) {
> return ret;
>