qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] docker: update fedora to f30


From: Daniel P . Berrangé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] docker: update fedora to f30
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 16:10:08 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 01:17:17PM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 9:41 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/24/19 1:40 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > Released last month.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > >  tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker 
> > > b/tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker
> > > index 69d4a7f5d7..1496b68ba1 100644
> > > --- a/tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker
> > > +++ b/tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker
> > > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > > -FROM fedora:29
> > > +FROM fedora:30
> >
> > Hmm this patch is pending for review:
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-05/msg00819.html
> 
> Oh I missed that. Maybe we should use "latest" to avoid bumping the
> version every 6 months.
> 
> fwiw we have different versions:
> 
> tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora-cris-cross.docker:FROM fedora:latest
> tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora-i386-cross.docker:FROM fedora:29
> tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker:FROM fedora:29
> 
> In 62559b916 "tests: update Fedora i386 cross image to Fedora 29", Daniel 
> said:
> 
>     Using the "latest" tag is not a good idea because this changes what
>     release it points to every 6 months. Together with caching of docker
>     builds this can cause confusion where CI has cached & built with Fedora
>     N, while a developer tries to reproduce a CI problem with Fedora N + 1,
>     or vica-verca.
> 
> But at the same time, Daniel bumped f28 to f29 in commit 19a9978db1.
> 
> It's confusing, do we need some stability or follow the latest?

The problem is introduced by local caching. "latest" may point to "29"
today, but the CI system had cached content meaining its use of "latest"
still resolved to "28".

Using "29" meant both CI & developers saw the same image, even when
caching is used.


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]