qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v2 00/28] Machine props patches


From: Marc-André Lureau
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v2 00/28] Machine props patches
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 00:50:29 +0400

Hi

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 8:40 PM Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 12:23, Marc-André Lureau
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Generalize machine compatibility properties
> >
> > During "[PATCH v2 05/10] qom/globals: generalize
> > object_property_set_globals()" review, Eduardo suggested to rework the
> > GlobalProperty handling, so that -global is limited to QDev only and
> > we avoid mixing the machine compats and the user-provided -global
> > properties (instead of generalizing -global to various object kinds,
> > like I proposed in v2).
> >
> > "qdev: do not mix compat props with global props" patch decouples a
> > bit user-provided -global from machine compat properties. This allows
> > to get rid of "user_provided" and "errp" fields in following patches.
> >
> > A new compat property "x-use-canonical-path-for-ramblock-id" is added
> > to hostmem for legacy canonical path names, set to true for -file and
> > -memfd with qemu < 4.0.
> >
> > (this series was initially titled "[PATCH v2 00/10] hostmem: use
> > object "id" for memory region name with >= 3.1", but its focus is more
> > in refactoring the global and compatilibity properties handling now)
>
> Hi; I've just noticed that this refactoring that removed all the
> HW_COMPAT and PC_COMPAT macros left a couple of references to
> them behind in documentation/comments:
>
> $ git grep HW_COMPAT
> docs/devel/migration.rst:   b) Add an entry to the ``HW_COMPAT_`` for
> the previous version that sets
> hw/i386/pc_piix.c: * HW_COMPAT_*, PC_COMPAT_*, or * pc_*_machine_options().
>
> Could you write a patch which updates these bits of documentation
> to refer to the new scheme, please?

Ok, patch sent. (it is trivial, as I didn't see any need to change the
documentation further)

thanks

-- 
Marc-André Lureau



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]