qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] tests/qemu-iotests/group: Remove some mo


From: Max Reitz
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] tests/qemu-iotests/group: Remove some more tests from the "auto" group
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 17:45:32 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2

On 16.07.19 17:44, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 16.07.19 17:31, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 16/07/2019 17.26, Max Reitz wrote:
>>> On 16.07.19 14:28, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>> Remove some more tests from the "auto" group that either have issues
>>>> in certain environments (like macOS or FreeBSD, or on certain file systems
>>>> like ZFS or tmpfs), do not work with the qcow2 format, or that are simply
>>>> taking too much time.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
>>>> ---
>>>>  tests/qemu-iotests/group | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>>>  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> I just looked through the list to see whether any of the test seems like
>>> we’d want to keep it even though it is a bit slow.  Mostly I was looking
>>> for tests that cover complex cases.
>>>
>>> 255 is the only one that seemed to fit that bill to me.  So why do you
>>> remove it?  Is it because it takes two seconds?
>>
>> No, I removed it because it was failing on macOS:
>>
>>  https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4860239294234624
>>
>> ("OSError: AF_UNIX path too long" is the error, if I got that right)
> 
> Ah, OK.  So, uh, we effectively can’t run any Python tests on macOS?

(Forgot the

Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <address@hidden>

because I’m so... amazed by that possibility)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]