qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/13] qcrypto-luks: refactoring: extract load/s


From: Daniel P . Berrangé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/13] qcrypto-luks: refactoring: extract load/store/check/parse header functions
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 11:32:53 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25)

On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 01:43:05AM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-08-20 at 20:01 +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> > On 14.08.19 22:22, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > With upcoming key management, the header will
> > > need to be stored after the image is created.
> > > 
> > > Extracting load header isn't strictly needed, but
> > > do this anyway for the symmetry.
> > > 
> > > Also I extracted a function that does basic sanity
> > > checks on the just read header, and a function
> > > which parses all the crypto format to make the
> > > code a bit more readable, plus now the code
> > > doesn't destruct the in-header cipher-mode string,
> > > so that the header now can be stored many times,
> > > which is needed for the key management.
> > > 
> > > Also this allows to contain the endianess conversions
> > > in these functions alone
> > > 
> > > The header is no longer endian swapped in place,
> > > to prevent (mostly theoretical races I think)
> > > races where someone could see the header in the
> > > process of beeing byteswapped.
> > 
> > The formatting looks weird, it doesn’t look quite 72 characters wide...
> >  (what commit messages normally use)
> Could you elaborate on that? I thought that code should not
> exceed 80 character limit.

Code itself should be wrapped at 80 chars, but it is common for
commit messages to use 72 chars wrapping.


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]