qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] tests/acceptance: Update MIPS Malta ssh tes


From: Aleksandar Markovic
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] tests/acceptance: Update MIPS Malta ssh test
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 19:59:07 +0200

22.08.2019. 05.15, "Aleksandar Markovic" <address@hidden> је
написао/ла:
>
>
> 21.08.2019. 23.00, "Eduardo Habkost" <address@hidden> је написао/ла:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:27:11PM +0200, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> > > 02.08.2019. 17.37, "Aleksandar Markovic" <
address@hidden> је
> > > написао/ла:
> > > >
> > > > From: Aleksandar Markovic <address@hidden>
> > > >
> > > > This little series improves linux_ssh_mips_malta.py, both in the
sense
> > > > of code organization and in the sense of quantity of executed tests.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hello, all.
> > >
> > > I am going to send a new version in few days, and I have a question
for
> > > test team:
> > >
> > > Currently, the outcome of the script execition is either PASS:1
FAIL:0 or
> > > PASS:0 FAIL:1. But the test actually consists of several subtests. Is
there
> > > any way that this single Python script considers these subtests as
separate
> > > tests (test cases), reporting something like PASS:12 FAIL:7? If yes,
what
> > > would be the best way to achieve that?
> >
> > If you are talking about each test_*() method, they are already
> > treated like separate tests.  If you mean treating each
> > ssh_command_output_contains() call as a separate test, this might
> > be difficult.
> >
>
> Yes, I meant the latter one, individual code segments involving an
invocation of ssh_command_output_contains() instance being treated as
separate tests.
>

Hello, Cleber,

I am willing to rewamp python file structure if needed.

The only thing I feel a little unconfortable is if I need to reboot the
virtual machine for each case of ssh_command_output_contains().

Grateful in advance,
Aleksandar

> > Cleber, is there something already available in the Avocado API
> > that would help us report more fine-grained results inside each
> > test case?
> >
>
> Thanks, that would be a better way of expressing my question.
>
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > Aleksandar
> > >
> > > > Aleksandar Markovic (2):
> > > >   tests/acceptance: Refactor and improve reporting in
> > > >     linux_ssh_mips_malta.py
> > > >   tests/acceptance: Add new test cases in linux_ssh_mips_malta.py
> > > >
> > > >  tests/acceptance/linux_ssh_mips_malta.py | 81
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > > >  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.7.4
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > Eduardo


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]