[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: iotest failure -- test possibly not using sufficiently unique temp f
From: |
Max Reitz |
Subject: |
Re: iotest failure -- test possibly not using sufficiently unique temp filename? |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:44:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 |
On 27.09.19 18:39, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Hi; I just saw this iotest failure (on an s390x box, as it happens):
>
> TEST iotest-qcow2: 130 [fail]
> QEMU --
> "/home/linux1/qemu/build/all/tests/qemu-iotests/../../s390x-softmmu/qemu-system-s390x"
> -nodefaults -display none -machine accel=qtest
> QEMU_IMG --
> "/home/linux1/qemu/build/all/tests/qemu-iotests/../../qemu-img"
> QEMU_IO --
> "/home/linux1/qemu/build/all/tests/qemu-iotests/../../qemu-io"
> --cache writeback -f qcow2
> QEMU_NBD --
> "/home/linux1/qemu/build/all/tests/qemu-iotests/../../qemu-nbd"
> IMGFMT -- qcow2 (compat=1.1)
> IMGPROTO -- file
> PLATFORM -- Linux/s390x lxub05 4.15.0-58-generic
> TEST_DIR -- /home/linux1/qemu/build/all/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch
> SOCKET_SCM_HELPER --
> /home/linux1/qemu/build/all/tests/qemu-iotests/socket_scm_helper
>
> --- /home/linux1/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/130.out 2019-05-10
> 12:27:16.948075733 -0400
> +++ /home/linux1/qemu/build/all/tests/qemu-iotests/130.out.bad
> 2019-09-27 12:01:23.649722655 -0400
> @@ -18,20 +18,22 @@
> QEMU X.Y.Z monitor - type 'help' for more information
> (qemu) commit testdisk
> (qemu)
> -image: TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT
> -file format: IMGFMT
> -virtual size: 64 MiB (67108864 bytes)
> -backing file: TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT.orig
> -backing file format: raw
> +qemu-img: Could not open 'TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT': Failed to get shared "write"
> lock
> +Is another process using the image [TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT]?
>
> === Marking image dirty (lazy refcounts) ===
>
> +qemu-img: TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT: Failed to get "write" lock
> +Is another process using the image [TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT]?
> Formatting 'TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT', fmt=IMGFMT size=67108864
> -wrote 4096/4096 bytes at offset 0
> -4 KiB, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> +qemu-io: can't open device
> /home/linux1/qemu/build/all/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch/t.qcow2: Failed
> to get "write" lock
> +Is another process using the image
> [/home/linux1/qemu/build/all/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch/t.qcow2]?
> +no file open, try 'help open'
> image: TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT
> file format: IMGFMT
> virtual size: 64 MiB (67108864 bytes)
> +backing file: TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT.orig
> +backing file format: raw
> Formatting 'TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT', fmt=IMGFMT size=67108864
> backing_file=TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT.orig backing_fmt=raw
> wrote 4096/4096 bytes at offset 0
> 4 KiB, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
>
>
>
> This looks suspiciously like the test isn't using a unique
> filename for its disk image: "qemu-iotests/scratch/t.qcow2"
> in the build directory, and so perhaps it has collided with
> another iotest ?
>
> If we run 'make check' with a -j<something> option do the
> iotests all get run serially anyway, or do they run in
> parallel against each other ?
As far as I know, all iotests are executed serially. Anything else
would not work with the same scratch directory.
The only thing I suspect is that some tool has been accidentally left
running by some previous test that still accesses its own image. But I
don’t know.
Max
(I’m personally still very skeptical of running some iotests in make
check, so I don’t have an opinion on the matter other than “If it fails,
we should remove it from make check”.)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature