[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/3] migration/postcopy: not necessary to do postcopy_ram_inc
From: |
Dr. David Alan Gilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/3] migration/postcopy: not necessary to do postcopy_ram_incoming_cleanup when state is ADVISE |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Oct 2019 17:02:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) |
* Wei Yang (address@hidden) wrote:
> postcopy_ram_incoming_cleanup() does cleanup for
> postcopy_ram_incoming_setup(), while the setup happens only after
> migration enters LISTEN state.
>
> This means there is nothing to cleanup when migration is still ADVISE
> state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <address@hidden>
> ---
> migration/migration.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
> index 5f7e4d15e9..34d5e66f06 100644
> --- a/migration/migration.c
> +++ b/migration/migration.c
> @@ -461,7 +461,6 @@ static void process_incoming_migration_co(void *opaque)
> * but managed to complete within the precopy period, we can use
> * the normal exit.
> */
> - postcopy_ram_incoming_cleanup(mis);
> } else if (ret >= 0) {
> /*
> * Postcopy was started, cleanup should happen at the end of the
I think that misses the cleanup of mlock that corresponds to the
munlockall in postcopy_ram_supported_by_host - that's called very early
on; I think in the advise stage.
Dave
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK