qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 2 PATCH 16/16] hw/core: Fix up the machine_set_cpu


From: Eduardo Habkost
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 2 PATCH 16/16] hw/core: Fix up the machine_set_cpu_numa_node for epyc
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 01:10:57 -0300

On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 07:13:29PM +0000, Moger, Babu wrote:
> Current topology id match will not work for epyc mode when setting
> the node id. In epyc mode, ids like smt_id, thread_id, core_id,
> ccx_id, socket_id can be same for more than one CPUs with across
> two numa nodes.
> 
> For example, we can have two CPUs with following ids on two different node.
> 1. smt_id=0, thread_id=0, core_id=0, ccx_id=0, socket_id=0, node_id=0
> 2. smt_id=0, thread_id=0, core_id=0, ccx_id=0, socket_id=0, node_id=1

I don't understand how that could happen.  If all IDs are the
same, how is it possible that those two cases should match two
different CPUs?

cpu_index_to_instance_props() must always return an unique
identifier for a single CPU.

> 
> The function machine_set_cpu_numa_node will fail to find a match to assign
> the node. Added new function machine_set_cpu_numa_node_epyc to set the node_id
> directly in epyc mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/core/machine.c   |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  hw/core/numa.c      |    6 +++++-
>  include/hw/boards.h |    4 ++++
>  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
> index 9a8586cf30..6bceefc6f3 100644
> --- a/hw/core/machine.c
> +++ b/hw/core/machine.c
> @@ -741,6 +741,30 @@ void machine_set_cpu_numa_node(MachineState *machine,
>      }
>  }
>  
> +void machine_set_cpu_numa_node_epyc(MachineState *machine,
> +                                    const CpuInstanceProperties *props,
> +                                    unsigned index,
> +                                    Error **errp)
> +{
> +    MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
> +    CPUArchId *slot;
> +
> +    if (!mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids) {
> +        error_setg(errp, "mapping of CPUs to NUMA node is not supported");
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* disabling node mapping is not supported, forbid it */
> +    assert(props->has_node_id);
> +
> +    /* force board to initialize possible_cpus if it hasn't been done yet */
> +    mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(machine);
> +
> +    slot = &machine->possible_cpus->cpus[index];
> +    slot->props.node_id = props->node_id;
> +    slot->props.has_node_id = props->has_node_id;
> +}
> +
>  static void smp_parse(MachineState *ms, QemuOpts *opts)
>  {
>      if (opts) {
> diff --git a/hw/core/numa.c b/hw/core/numa.c
> index 27fa6b5e1d..a9e835aea6 100644
> --- a/hw/core/numa.c
> +++ b/hw/core/numa.c
> @@ -247,7 +247,11 @@ void set_numa_node_options(MachineState *ms, NumaOptions 
> *object, Error **errp)
>           props = mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props(ms, cpus->value);
>           props.node_id = nodenr;
>           props.has_node_id = true;
> -         machine_set_cpu_numa_node(ms, &props, &err);
> +         if (ms->epyc) {
> +             machine_set_cpu_numa_node_epyc(ms, &props, cpus->value, &err);
> +         } else {
> +             machine_set_cpu_numa_node(ms, &props, &err);
> +         }
>           if (err) {
>              error_propagate(errp, err);
>              return;
> diff --git a/include/hw/boards.h b/include/hw/boards.h
> index 0001d42e50..ec1b1c5a85 100644
> --- a/include/hw/boards.h
> +++ b/include/hw/boards.h
> @@ -74,6 +74,10 @@ HotpluggableCPUList 
> *machine_query_hotpluggable_cpus(MachineState *machine);
>  void machine_set_cpu_numa_node(MachineState *machine,
>                                 const CpuInstanceProperties *props,
>                                 Error **errp);
> +void machine_set_cpu_numa_node_epyc(MachineState *machine,
> +                                    const CpuInstanceProperties *props,
> +                                    unsigned index,
> +                                    Error **errp);
>  
>  void machine_class_allow_dynamic_sysbus_dev(MachineClass *mc, const char 
> *type);
>  
> 

-- 
Eduardo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]