qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3] ssi: xilinx_spips: Skip spi bus update for few register w


From: Francisco Iglesias
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ssi: xilinx_spips: Skip spi bus update for few register writes
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 14:47:06 +0200
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

Hi Sai,

On [2019 Oct 18] Fri 14:39:04, Sai Pavan Boddu wrote:
> Few of the register writes need not update the spi bus state, so just
> return after reg write. Added few more dummy register offsets which need
> the same behaviour.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sai Pavan Boddu <address@hidden>
> ---
> Changes for V2:
>       Just skip update of spips cs and fifos
>       Update commit message accordingly
> Changes for V3:
>       Avoid checking for zynqmp qspi
>       Skip spi bus update for few of the registers
> 
>  hw/ssi/xilinx_spips.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ssi/xilinx_spips.c b/hw/ssi/xilinx_spips.c
> index a309c71..c23de47 100644
> --- a/hw/ssi/xilinx_spips.c
> +++ b/hw/ssi/xilinx_spips.c
> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@
>  #define R_GPIO              (0x30 / 4)
>  #define R_LPBK_DLY_ADJ      (0x38 / 4)
>  #define R_LPBK_DLY_ADJ_RESET (0x33)
> +#define R_IOU_TAPDLY_BYPASS (0x3C / 4)
>  #define R_TXD1              (0x80 / 4)
>  #define R_TXD2              (0x84 / 4)
>  #define R_TXD3              (0x88 / 4)
> @@ -139,6 +140,8 @@
>  #define R_LQSPI_STS         (0xA4 / 4)
>  #define LQSPI_STS_WR_RECVD      (1 << 1)
>  
> +#define R_DUMMY_CYCLE_EN    (0xC8 / 4)
> +#define R_ECO               (0xF8 / 4)
>  #define R_MOD_ID            (0xFC / 4)
>  
>  #define R_GQSPI_SELECT          (0x144 / 4)
> @@ -1022,6 +1025,15 @@ static void xilinx_spips_write(void *opaque, hwaddr 
> addr,
>      }
>      s->regs[addr] = (s->regs[addr] & ~mask) | (value & mask);
>  no_reg_update:
> +    /* Skip SPI bus update for below registers writes */
> +    switch (addr) {
> +    case R_GPIO:
> +    case R_LPBK_DLY_ADJ:
> +    case R_IOU_TAPDLY_BYPASS:
> +    case R_DUMMY_CYCLE_EN:
> +    case R_ECO:

Would it be ok for you to move above cases into the switch case above in
this same function instead? (And add a reg write before returning) This
way all registers are handled at the same place (switch case).

Best regards,
Francisco Iglesias

> +        return;
> +    }
>      xilinx_spips_update_cs_lines(s);
>      xilinx_spips_check_flush(s);
>      xilinx_spips_update_cs_lines(s);
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]