qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2] mc146818rtc: fix timer interrupt reinjection


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mc146818rtc: fix timer interrupt reinjection
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:08:22 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1

On 10/24/19 1:22 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 10/10/19 2:30 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

commit 369b41359af46bded5799c9ef8be2b641d92e043 broke timer interrupt
reinjection when there is no period change by the guest.

In that case, old_period is 0, which ends up zeroing irq_coalesced
(counter of reinjected interrupts).

The consequence is Windows 7 is unable to synchronize time via NTP.
Easily reproducible by playing a fullscreen video with cirrus and VNC.

Fix by not updating s->irq_coalesced when old_period is 0.

V2: reorganize code (Paolo Bonzini)

^ This line shouldn't be part of git history,
Paolo if possible can you drop it?


Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <address@hidden>

diff --git a/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c b/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c
index 6cb378751b..0e7cf97042 100644
--- a/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c
+++ b/hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c
@@ -203,24 +203,28 @@ periodic_timer_update(RTCState *s, int64_t current_time, uint32_t old_period)
      period = rtc_periodic_clock_ticks(s);
-    if (period) {
-        /* compute 32 khz clock */
-        cur_clock =
-            muldiv64(current_time, RTC_CLOCK_RATE, NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND);
+    if (!period) {
+        s->irq_coalesced = 0;
+        timer_del(s->periodic_timer);
+        return;
+    }

This is the first change, simplify the if statement with a return.

-        /*
-        * if the periodic timer's update is due to period re-configuration,
-        * we should count the clock since last interrupt.
-        */
-        if (old_period) {
-            int64_t last_periodic_clock, next_periodic_clock;
-
-            next_periodic_clock = muldiv64(s->next_periodic_time,
-                                    RTC_CLOCK_RATE, NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND);
-            last_periodic_clock = next_periodic_clock - old_period;
-            lost_clock = cur_clock - last_periodic_clock;
-            assert(lost_clock >= 0);
-        }
+    /* compute 32 khz clock */
+    cur_clock =
+        muldiv64(current_time, RTC_CLOCK_RATE, NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND);
+
+    /*
+     * if the periodic timer's update is due to period re-configuration,
+     * we should count the clock since last interrupt.
+     */
+    if (old_period) {
+        int64_t last_periodic_clock, next_periodic_clock;
+
+        next_periodic_clock = muldiv64(s->next_periodic_time,
+                                RTC_CLOCK_RATE, NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND);
+        last_periodic_clock = next_periodic_clock - old_period;
+        lost_clock = cur_clock - last_periodic_clock;
+        assert(lost_clock >= 0);
          /*
           * s->irq_coalesced can change for two reasons:
@@ -251,22 +255,19 @@ periodic_timer_update(RTCState *s, int64_t current_time, uint32_t old_period)
                  rtc_coalesced_timer_update(s);
              }
          } else {
-           /*
+            /*
               * no way to compensate the interrupt if LOST_TICK_POLICY_SLEW
               * is not used, we should make the time progress anyway.
               */
              lost_clock = MIN(lost_clock, period);
          }
+    }

This is the second change, changing the logic and fixing the bug.

-        assert(lost_clock >= 0 && lost_clock <= period);
+    assert(lost_clock >= 0 && lost_clock <= period);
-        next_irq_clock = cur_clock + period - lost_clock;
-        s->next_periodic_time = periodic_clock_to_ns(next_irq_clock) + 1;
-        timer_mod(s->periodic_timer, s->next_periodic_time);
-    } else {
-        s->irq_coalesced = 0;
-        timer_del(s->periodic_timer);
-    }
+    next_irq_clock = cur_clock + period - lost_clock;
+    s->next_periodic_time = periodic_clock_to_ns(next_irq_clock) + 1;
+    timer_mod(s->periodic_timer, s->next_periodic_time);

This is part of the 1st change.

I'd rather see this patch split in 2 logical changes...

Since this split makes sense to me (easier to understand the patch diff when reviewing), I can quickly do it if you don't mind.

  }
  static void rtc_periodic_timer(void *opaque)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]